Literature DB >> 9061113

Hemodynamic, sympathetic and angiotensin II responses to PEEP ventilation before and during administration of isoflurane.

A Aneman1, J Pontén, L Fändriks, G Eisenhofer, P Friberg, B Biber.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) ventilation and isoflurane anesthesia may opposingly affect the sympathetic nervous and renin-angiotensin systems. This study was performed to elucidate the modulatory effects of isoflurane anesthesia on the neurohumoral and cardiovascular responses to PEEP.
METHODS: Renin-angiotensin and sympathetic nervous activity were investigated in mechanically ventilated, normovolemic, chloralose anesthetized pigs before and during administration of 1.4% isoflurane. Arterial angiotensin II (AII) concentrations were measured and systemic, mesenteric, hepatic and renal spillover of norepinephrine (NE-SO) were calculated using isotope dilution. Regional hemodynamic variables were investigated in parallel.
RESULTS: PEEP10 alone moderately elevated AII levels (+12.5 +/- 4.9 pg/ml, P < 0.05) and increased systemic (+22 +/- 2.9 pmol.min.100 g-1, P < 0.05) and notably mesenteric (+32 +/- 9.6 pmol.min.100 g-1, P < 0.05) NE-SO. Blood flow decreased in all vascular beds studied. Except for in the liver, isoflurane generally reduced NE-SO compared to baseline but did not change AII concentrations. Strikingly, the sympathoexcitatory response to PEEP10 was inhibited, whereas AII increased markedly (+284 +/- 64 pg/ml, P < 0.05) during PEEP10 and isoflurane. Renal blood flow was significantly more reduced during PEEP10 and isoflurane compared to PEEP10 alone, whereas the magnitude of reductions were similar in the other vascular beds.
CONCLUSION: The data suggest that renin-angiotensin activation is important to attenuate the impact of PEEP ventilation on cardiovascular performance during administration of the sympathodepressant isoflurane. Interference with the renin-angiotensin system may cause cardiovascular decompensation in isoflurane anesthetized patients subjected to PEEP-ventilation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9061113     DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.1997.tb04611.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Anaesthesiol Scand        ISSN: 0001-5172            Impact factor:   2.105


  5 in total

1.  Acute hemodynamic changes during lung recruitment in lavage and endotoxin-induced ALI.

Authors:  Helena Odenstedt; Anders Aneman; Sigurbergur Kárason; Ola Stenqvist; Stefan Lundin
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2004-12-17       Impact factor: 17.440

2.  Clinical outcomes in patients with ICU-related pancreatitis.

Authors:  Chia-Cheng Tseng; Wen-Feng Fang; Yu-Hsiu Chung; Yi-Hsi Wang; Ivor S Douglas; Meng-Chih Lin
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-10-21       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Do lung recruitment maneuvers decrease gastric mucosal perfusion?

Authors:  J Claesson; S Lehtipalo; O Winsö
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2003-07-08       Impact factor: 17.440

4.  Gastrointestinal Bleeding in Patients With Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: A National Database Analysis.

Authors:  Faraz Siddiqui; Moiz Ahmed; Saqib Abbasi; Akshay Avula; Abdul Hasan Siddiqui; Jobin Philipose; Hafiz M Khan; Tahir M A Khan; Liliane Deeb; Michel Chalhoub
Journal:  J Clin Med Res       Date:  2018-12-03

5.  Effects of different peep levels on mesenteric leukocyte-endothelial interactions in rats during mechanical ventilation.

Authors:  Priscila Aikawa; Sandra Helena Poliselli Farsky; Maria Aparecida de Oliveira; Rogério Pazetti; Thaís Mauad; Paulina Sannomiya; Naomi Kondo Nakagawa
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 2.365

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.