OBJECTIVE: To assess acute cardiorespiratory effects of recruitment manoeuvres in experimental acute lung injury. DESIGN: Experimental study in animal models of acute lung injury. SETTING: Experimental laboratory at a University Medical Centre. ANIMALS: Ten pigs with bronchoalveolar lavage and eight pigs with endotoxin-induced ALI. INTERVENTIONS: Two kinds of recruitment manoeuvres during 1 min; a) vital capacity manoeuvres (ViCM) consisting in a sustained inflation at 30 cmH(2)O and 40 cmH(2)O; b) manoeuvres obtained during ongoing pressure-controlled ventilation (PCRM) with peak airway pressure 30 cmH(2)O, positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) 15 and peak airway pressure 40, PEEP 20. Recruitment manoeuvres were repeated after volume expansion (dextran 8 ml/kg). Oxygenation, mean arterial, and pulmonary artery pressures, aortic, mesenteric, and renal blood flow were monitored. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Lower pressure recruitment manoeuvres (ViCM30 and PCRM30/15) did not significantly improve oxygenation. With ViCM and PCRM at peak airway pressure 40 cmH(2)O, PaO(2) increased to similar levels in both lavage and endotoxin groups. Aortic blood flow was reduced from baseline during PCRM40/20 and ViCM40 by 57+/-3% and 61+/-6% in the lavage group and by 57+/-8% and 82+/-7% (P<0.05 vs PCRM40/20) in endotoxin group. The decrease in blood pressure was less pronounced. Prior volume expansion attenuated circulatory impairment. After cessation of recruitment hemodynamic parameters were restored within 3 min. CONCLUSION: Effective recruitment resulted in systemic hypotension, pulmonary hypertension, and decrease in aortic blood flow especially in endotoxinemic animals. Circulatory depression may be attenuated using recruitment manoeuvres during ongoing pressure-controlled ventilation and by prior volume expansion.
OBJECTIVE: To assess acute cardiorespiratory effects of recruitment manoeuvres in experimental acute lung injury. DESIGN: Experimental study in animal models of acute lung injury. SETTING: Experimental laboratory at a University Medical Centre. ANIMALS: Ten pigs with bronchoalveolar lavage and eight pigs with endotoxin-induced ALI. INTERVENTIONS: Two kinds of recruitment manoeuvres during 1 min; a) vital capacity manoeuvres (ViCM) consisting in a sustained inflation at 30 cmH(2)O and 40 cmH(2)O; b) manoeuvres obtained during ongoing pressure-controlled ventilation (PCRM) with peak airway pressure 30 cmH(2)O, positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) 15 and peak airway pressure 40, PEEP 20. Recruitment manoeuvres were repeated after volume expansion (dextran 8 ml/kg). Oxygenation, mean arterial, and pulmonary artery pressures, aortic, mesenteric, and renal blood flow were monitored. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Lower pressure recruitment manoeuvres (ViCM30 and PCRM30/15) did not significantly improve oxygenation. With ViCM and PCRM at peak airway pressure 40 cmH(2)O, PaO(2) increased to similar levels in both lavage and endotoxin groups. Aortic blood flow was reduced from baseline during PCRM40/20 and ViCM40 by 57+/-3% and 61+/-6% in the lavage group and by 57+/-8% and 82+/-7% (P<0.05 vs PCRM40/20) in endotoxin group. The decrease in blood pressure was less pronounced. Prior volume expansion attenuated circulatory impairment. After cessation of recruitment hemodynamic parameters were restored within 3 min. CONCLUSION: Effective recruitment resulted in systemic hypotension, pulmonary hypertension, and decrease in aortic blood flow especially in endotoxinemic animals. Circulatory depression may be attenuated using recruitment manoeuvres during ongoing pressure-controlled ventilation and by prior volume expansion.
Authors: T E Kloot; L Blanch; A Melynne Youngblood; C Weinert; A B Adams; J J Marini; R S Shapiro; A Nahum Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2000-05 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Salvatore Grasso; Luciana Mascia; Monica Del Turco; Paolo Malacarne; Francesco Giunta; Laurent Brochard; Arthur S Slutsky; V Marco Ranieri Journal: Anesthesiology Date: 2002-04 Impact factor: 7.892
Authors: Sophie Lindgren; Helena Odenstedt; Cecilia Olegård; Sören Söndergaard; Stefan Lundin; Ola Stenqvist Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2006-10-27 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Peter Andrews; Elie Azoulay; Massimo Antonelli; Laurent Brochard; Christian Brun-Buisson; Geoffrey Dobb; Jean-Yves Fagon; Herwig Gerlach; Johan Groeneveld; Jordi Mancebo; Philipp Metnitz; Stefano Nava; Jerome Pugin; Michael Pinsky; Peter Radermacher; Christian Richard; Robert Tasker Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2006-02-18 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Fares Alghanem; Ryan P Davis; Benjamin S Bryner; Hayley R Hoffman; John Trahanas; Marie S Cornell; Alvaro Rojas-Peña; Robert H Bartlett; Ronald B Hirschl Journal: ASAIO J Date: 2015 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 2.872
Authors: Carol Hodgson; Ewan C Goligher; Meredith E Young; Jennifer L Keating; Anne E Holland; Lorena Romero; Scott J Bradley; David Tuxen Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2016-11-17
Authors: Jonas Nielsen; Morten Østergaard; Jesper Kjaergaard; Jens Tingleff; Preben G Berthelsen; Eigil Nygård; Anders Larsson Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2005-08-12 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Helena Odenstedt; Sophie Lindgren; Cecilia Olegård; Karin Erlandsson; Sven Lethvall; Anders Aneman; Ola Stenqvist; Stefan Lundin Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2005-09-22 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Patrik Rossi; Björn Persson; Piet J M Boels; Anders Arner; Eddie Weitzberg; Anders Oldner Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2008-01-24 Impact factor: 17.440