Literature DB >> 9058114

Laparoscopic treatment for choledocholithiasis: a prospective evaluation in 247 consecutive unselected patients.

B Millat1, J Atger, A Deleuze, H Briandet, A Fingerhut, F Guillon, E Marrel, C De Seguin, P Soulier.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Evaluation of the feasibility and results of the one-stage treatment combining routine intraoperative cholangiography and laparoscopic common bile duct exploration for choledocholithiasis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Multicentric (5 centers-9 surgeons) prospective study in 247 consecutive patients (mean age 68 years; range 21-92) during a 50-month period (November 1991-December 1995). Laparoscopic treatment of choledocholithiasis was attempted irrespective of the circumstances leading to the diagnosis of biliary lithiasis or the preoperative suspicion of choledocholithiasis.
RESULTS: One out of four patients (n = 61) had unsuspected choledocholithiasis disclosed by routine intraoperative cholangiography. A laparoscopic complete clearance of choledocholithiasis was achieved in 208 of 236 attempted cases (88%), with either transcystic duct extraction (n = 116) or choledochotomy (n = 92). Open surgery was required in 20 patients for failure of laparoscopic treatment and in 3 patients despite successful extraction. Twenty-one of 25 patients (84%) referred for failure of retrograde endoscopic stone extraction had successful laparoscopic choledocholithiasis clearance. The mean duration for the laparoscopic transcystic approach and choledochotomy were 108 min (range 50-300) and 173 min (range 70-480), respectively. Eleven patients had retained stones (4.4%). Minor and major complications were recorded in 9 and 22 patients respectively. The operative mortality was 0.4% (95% confidence interval: 0-1.2%).
CONCLUSION: Intraoperative cholangiography during laparoscopic cholecystectomy and laparoscopic common bile duct exploration when required should be considered as the simplest and most efficient treatment for choledocholithiasis. The multicenter character of this study including consecutive patients from public and private practices, strengthens our conclusions and is consistent with a wide diffusion of this diagnostic and therapeutic strategy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9058114

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hepatogastroenterology        ISSN: 0172-6390


  19 in total

1.  Laparoscopic management of common bile duct stones.

Authors:  S Ebner; J Rechner; S Beller; K Erhart; F M Riegler; G Szinicz
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-02-02       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Knotless choledochorraphy with barbed suture, safe and feasible.

Authors:  Luis C Fernandez; Augusto Toriz; Jorge Hernandez; Norberto Sanchez; Erick Linares; Massiel Zenteno; Adolfo Cuendis; Jose Olivares; Gustavo Guerrero; Cesar F Cervantes
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-11-05       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Thirteen years' experience with laparoscopic transcystic common bile duct exploration for stones. Effectiveness and long-term results.

Authors:  A M Paganini; M Guerrieri; J Sarnari; A De Sanctis; G D'Ambrosio; G Lezoche; S Perretta; E Lezoche
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-11-16       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  A randomized comparison of primary closure and T-tube drainage of the common bile duct after laparoscopic choledochotomy.

Authors:  Zhang Leida; Bie Ping; Wang Shuguang; He Yu
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-01-18       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 5.  Systematic review with meta-analysis of studies comparing primary duct closure and T-tube drainage after laparoscopic common bile duct exploration for choledocholithiasis.

Authors:  Mauro Podda; Francesco Maria Polignano; Andreas Luhmann; Michael Samuel James Wilson; Christoph Kulli; Iain Stephen Tait
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-06-20       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Does the surgeon's experience influence the outcome of laparoscopic treatment of common bile duct stones?

Authors:  Astrid Herrero; Claire Philippe; Françoise Guillon; Bertrand Millat; Frédéric Borie
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-06-27       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 7.  Surgical versus endoscopic treatment of bile duct stones.

Authors:  Bobby V M Dasari; Chuan Jin Tan; Kurinchi Selvan Gurusamy; David J Martin; Gareth Kirk; Lloyd McKie; Tom Diamond; Mark A Taylor
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2013-12-12

8.  Long-term results after laparoscopic transverse choledochotomy for common bile duct stones.

Authors:  A M Paganini; M Guerrieri; J Sarnari; A De Sanctis; G D'Ambrosio; G Lezoche; E Lezoche
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2005-03-23       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 9.  Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for cholelithiasis 2016.

Authors:  Susumu Tazuma; Michiaki Unno; Yoshinori Igarashi; Kazuo Inui; Kazuhisa Uchiyama; Masahiro Kai; Toshio Tsuyuguchi; Hiroyuki Maguchi; Toshiyuki Mori; Koji Yamaguchi; Shomei Ryozawa; Yuji Nimura; Naotaka Fujita; Keiichi Kubota; Junichi Shoda; Masami Tabata; Tetsuya Mine; Kentaro Sugano; Mamoru Watanabe; Tooru Shimosegawa
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-12-10       Impact factor: 7.527

10.  Comparison of long-term results of laparoscopic and endoscopic exploration of common bile duct.

Authors:  S S Rai; V V Grubnik; O L Kovalchuk; O V Grubnik
Journal:  J Minim Access Surg       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 1.407

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.