Literature DB >> 9057142

Abduction strength following intramedullary nailing of the femur.

G I Bain1, A C Zacest, D C Paterson, J Middleton, A P Pohl.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To assess hip abductor function, strength and complaints following insertion of a femoral intramedullary nail.
DESIGN: Retrospective clinical review.
SETTING: Department of Orthopaedics, Adelaide Women's and Children's Hospital, Adelaide. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Trauma, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia. PATIENTS: 1. 32 of 37 patients who had an intramedullary nail inserted for an isolated femoral shaft fracture at the Royal Adelaide Hospital between 1987 and 1990. 2. 14 of 18 patients who had closed femoral shortening for leg length discrepancy, at the Adelaide Women's and Children's Hospital between 1985 and 1987. Patients with pathology involving the abductor mechanism were excluded. 3. 40 asymptomatic controls. INTERVENTION: Intramedullary fixation for femoral shaft fractures or as part of closed femoral shortening. All procedures were performed on a traction table via a gluteal splitting approach with reamed nails. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Complaints included, pain, stiffness, limp and diminished walking distance. Examination of abductor function and measurement of abductor strength. Radiological assessment at followup.
RESULTS: Complaints included trochanteric pain (40%, 40%), thigh pain (10%, 8%) and limp (13%, 42%) in the femoral fracture and closed femoral shortening groups respectively. There was significant difference in the abduction strength (p < 0.01) and abduction ratio (p < 0.01) between the control and each treatment group. Abductor weakness correlated (r = 0.30) with the incidence of complaints.
CONCLUSION: Pain, limp and weakness are common following insertion of a femoral intramedullary nail. Agluteal retracting approach may minimize abductor weakness.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9057142     DOI: 10.1097/00005131-199702000-00004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Trauma        ISSN: 0890-5339            Impact factor:   2.512


  10 in total

1.  [Clinical results with A new retrograde femoral nail with a radiographical-free proximal locking device. A prospective study with 50 fractures].

Authors:  B Friemert; P Keppler; F von Lübken; C Willy; L Claes; H Gerngross; D Wörz
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 1.000

2.  [Not Available].

Authors:  B R Moed; J Tracy Watson
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 1.154

3.  Anatomy of the greater trochanteric 'bald spot': a potential portal for abductor sparing femoral nailing?

Authors:  Michael J Gardner; William J Robertson; Sreevathsa Boraiah; Joseph U Barker; Dean G Lorich
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-03-18       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Femur fractures in professional athletes: a case series.

Authors:  Robby Sikka; Gary Fetzer; Thomas Hunkele; Eric Sugarman; Joel Boyd
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2015-02-13       Impact factor: 2.860

5.  Decreased muscle strength is associated with impaired long-term functional outcome after intramedullary nailing of femoral shaft fracture.

Authors:  P Larsen; R Elsoe; T Graven-Nielsen; U Laessoe; S Rasmussen
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2014-12-24       Impact factor: 3.693

Review 6.  [The standard implantation of a total hip prosthesis via two incisions (the Yale Technique)].

Authors:  Robert Kipping
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 1.154

7.  Functional outcome and persistent disability after isolated fracture of the femur.

Authors:  David W Sanders; Mark MacLeod; Tanya Charyk-Stewart; Jeannette Lydestad; Andrea Domonkos; Christina Tieszer
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 2.089

8.  Intramedullary femoral nailing through the trochanteric fossa versus greater trochanter tip: a randomized controlled study with in-depth functional outcome results.

Authors:  C M Ansari Moein; H J Ten Duis; P L Oey; G A P de Kort; W van der Meulen; Chr van der Werken
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2011-03-19       Impact factor: 3.693

Review 9.  Antegrade versus retrograde nailing techniques and trochanteric versus piriformis intramedullary nailing entry points for femoral shaft fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Nasir Hussain; Farrah Naz Hussain; Corey Sermer; Hera Kamdar; Emil H Schemitsch; Amir Sternheim; Paul Kuzyk
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 2.089

10.  ENTRY POINT FOR THE ANTEGRADE FEMORAL INTRAMEDULLARY NAIL: A CADAVER STUDY.

Authors:  Pedro José Labronici; Luiz Galeno; Thiago Martins Teixeira; José Sergio Franco; Rolix Hoffmann; Paulo Roberto Barbosa de Toledo Lourenço; Vincenzo Giordano; Alexandre Pallottino; Ney Pecegueiro do Amaral
Journal:  Rev Bras Ortop       Date:  2015-12-07
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.