Literature DB >> 9055363

Offset laminar hooks decrease bending moments of pedicle screws during in situ contouring.

S A Yerby1, J R Ehteshami, R F McLain.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: A biomechanical study was conducted using cadaver spines to determine the influence of supplemental offset laminar hooks on pedicle screw bending moments and migration during in situ contouring of short-segment pedicle instrumentation.
OBJECTIVES: To determine the effects of offset laminar hooks on short-segment pedicle instrumentation constructs during in situ contouring. It was hypothesized that the screw bending moments and screw migration would decrease when offset laminar hooks were used with short-segment pedicle instrumentation. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Clinical studies have implicated screw bending or breakage at the screw hub as failure mechanisms in short-segment pedicle instrumentation constructs used to stabilize thoracolumbar fractures, particularly when rods are contoured in situ.
METHODS: Cadaver spines were instrumented using short-segment pedicle instrumentation or short-segment pedicle instrumentation with supplemental offset laminar hooks. The instrumentation was contoured in situ, and screw bending moments were measured at the hub of the screws. Screw migration was measured from lateral radiographs. Comparisons of screw bending moments and migration were made between the two instrumentation configurations.
RESULTS: The addition of offset laminar hooks significantly reduced screw bending moments and screw migration during in situ contouring. The mean screw bending moments decreased approximately 30% at the maximum bending angle of 30 degrees (P < 0.05), and the mean screw migration during contouring decreased from 8 degrees to 2 degrees (P < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Addition of offset laminar hooks to short-segment pedicle instrumentation decreases screw bending moments and migration of the screws during in situ contouring of the rod. The authors speculate that decrease in loading of the screw will improve durability of the constructs clinically.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9055363     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199702150-00004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  5 in total

1.  Biomechanical evaluation of a bipedicular spinal fixation device: three different strength tests.

Authors:  Laurent Balabaud; Emeric Gallard; Wafa Skalli; Bernard Dupas; Robert Roger; François Lavaste; Jean-Paul Steib
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2003-04-05       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Thoracolumbar fractures surgically treated by "in situ contouring".

Authors:  Jean-Paul Steib; Mourad Aoui; Anca Mitulescu; Ioan Bogorin; Xavier Chiffolot; Jean-Michel Cognet; Patrick Simon
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-07-06       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 3.  In situ contouring technique in the treatment of thoracolumbar fractures.

Authors:  Jean-Paul Steib; Yann Philippe Charles; Mourad Aoui
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-08-11       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Distal short segment fixation of thoracolumbar and lumbar injuries.

Authors:  J A Glaser; W J Estes
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  1998

5.  Posterior pedicle screw fixation with supplemental laminar hook fixation for the treatment of thoracolumbar burst fractures.

Authors:  Stéphane Leduc; Jean-Marc Mac-Thiong; Gilles Maurais; Alain Jodoin
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 2.089

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.