Literature DB >> 9052640

Complications of hydroxyapatite orbital implants. A review of 100 consecutive cases and a comparison of Dexon mesh (polyglycolic acid) with scleral wrapping.

J H Oestreicher1, E Liu, M Berkowitz.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The authors analyzed all the complications associates with the first 100 hydroxyapatite orbital implants performed by one surgeon, and compare scleral wrapping versus Dexon mesh (polyglycolic acid, Davis & Geck, Manati, Puerto Rico) wrapping in light of these complications.
BACKGROUND: Prior studies have not included the full range of complications that can occur with hydroxyapatite orbital implants. Dexon mesh implant wrapping is a promising substitute for sclera and avoids the risks involved in using donor tissue.
METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 100 consecutive cases was performed.
RESULTS: Many minor complications occurred, but the rate of exposure was low (3%) and no implant was lost. Dexon mesh wrapping was similar to scleral wrapping with respect to complications, although more posterior implant placement was necessary to avoid exposure in the Dexon-wrapped group.
CONCLUSIONS: Surgeons and patients must be prepared for many minor complications when using hydroxyapatite orbital implants, but these can be readily overcome. Dexon mesh wrapping of the implant is recommended to avoid using donor tissue.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9052640     DOI: 10.1016/s0161-6420(97)30316-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmology        ISSN: 0161-6420            Impact factor:   12.079


  12 in total

1.  Complications of motility peg placement for porous hydroxyapatite orbital implants.

Authors:  C-J Lin; S-L Liao; J-R Jou; S C S Kao; P-K Hou; M-S Chen
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 4.638

2.  Autogenous temporalis fascia patch graft for porous polyethylene (Medpor) sphere orbital implant exposure.

Authors:  M S Sagoo; J M Olver
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 4.638

3.  Amniotic membrane transplantation for porous sphere orbital implant exposure.

Authors:  Yan-hong Chen; Hong-guang Cui
Journal:  J Zhejiang Univ Sci B       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 3.066

4.  Remove, rotate, and reimplant: a novel technique for the management of exposed porous anophthalmic implants in eviscerated patients.

Authors:  P Kaynak; G O Karabulut; C Ozturker; I Perente; B Gökyiǧit; A Demirok; O F Yilmaz
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2014-02-07       Impact factor: 3.775

5.  The application of an acellular dermal allograft (AlloDerm) for patients with insufficient conjunctiva during evisceration and implantation surgery.

Authors:  S J Park; Y Kim; S Y Jang
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2017-08-11       Impact factor: 3.775

6.  High density porous polyethylene material (Medpor) as an unwrapped orbital implant.

Authors:  Yan-hong Chen; Hong-guang Cui
Journal:  J Zhejiang Univ Sci B       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 3.066

7.  Effect of basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF) on the treatment of exposure of the orbital implants.

Authors:  Hong-guang Cui; Hui-yan Li
Journal:  J Zhejiang Univ Sci B       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 3.066

8.  Long-term surgical outcomes of porous polyethylene orbital implants: a review of 314 cases.

Authors:  Su-Kyung Jung; Won-Kyung Cho; Ji-Sun Paik; Suk-Woo Yang
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-11-17       Impact factor: 4.638

Review 9.  The Anophthalmic Socket - Reconstruction Options.

Authors:  S Schmitzer; C Simionescu; C Alexandrescu; M Burcea
Journal:  J Med Life       Date:  2014

10.  In vivo vascularization of MSC-loaded porous hydroxyapatite constructs coated with VEGF-functionalized collagen/heparin multilayers.

Authors:  Kai Jin; Bo Li; Lixia Lou; Yufeng Xu; Xin Ye; Ke Yao; Juan Ye; Changyou Gao
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-01-22       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.