Literature DB >> 8380275

Noninvasive ductal carcinoma of the breast: the relevance of histologic categorization.

C O Bellamy1, C McDonald, D M Salter, U Chetty, T J Anderson.   

Abstract

A consecutive series of 130 review-confirmed cases of noninvasive ductal carcinoma of breast (DCIS) in women without previous breast carcinoma was analyzed. Histologic variables assessed included histologic pattern, nuclear grade, necrosis, and involved duct counts. These were correlated with presentation, extent of DCIS in the breast, completeness of excision, and outcome. Comedo DCIS had an occult presentation significantly more often than noncomedo DCIS. Micropapillary DCIS was significantly more likely than other patterns to involve multiple quadrants of breast, irrespective of nuclear grade or necrosis. Solid DCIS was significantly more often completely excised when compared with all other patterns, while high-grade DCIS was significantly more often incompletely excised compared with low-grade DCIS. Follow-up showed invasive recurrence in 16% of cases treated by primary local excision only and 3% cases treated by mastectomy or with re-excision. Of local excision cases with follow-up longer than 3 years, 22% had invasive recurrence. Invasive recurrence only followed high-grade DCIS and most often followed comedo DCIS. The need for strict definition of categories of DCIS is stressed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8380275     DOI: 10.1016/0046-8177(93)90057-n

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Pathol        ISSN: 0046-8177            Impact factor:   3.466


  29 in total

1.  Consistency in the observation of features used to classify duct carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of the breast.

Authors:  A G Douglas-Jones; J M Morgan; M A Appleton; R L Attanoos; A Caslin; C S Champ; M Cotter; N S Dallimore; A Dawson; R W Fortt; A P Griffiths; M Hughes; P A Kitching; C O'Brien; A M Rashid; D Stock; A Verghese; D W Williams; N W Williams; S Williams
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 3.411

2.  Effect of margins of excision on recurrence after local excision of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast.

Authors:  A G Douglas-Jones; J Logan; J M Morgan; R Johnson; R Williams
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 3.411

3.  Breast conservation therapy for ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS): does presentation of disease affect long-term outcomes?

Authors:  Harrison X Bai; Sabin B Motwani; Susan A Higgins; Bruce G Haffty; Lynn D Wilson; Donald R Lannin; Suzanne B Evans; Meena S Moran
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-06-19       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 4.  Ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast.

Authors:  M J Silverstein
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-09-12

5.  Cytological and architectural heterogeneity in ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast.

Authors:  C M Quinn; J L Ostrowski
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 3.411

6.  C-Erb-b2 oncogene expression in intraductal proliferative lesions of the breast.

Authors:  Filiz Eren; Zerrin Calay; Haydar Durak; Bülent Eren; Nil Comunoğlu; Ovgü Aydin
Journal:  Bosn J Basic Med Sci       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 3.363

7.  [Prognostic factors in ductal carcinoma in situ].

Authors:  A Lebeau
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 1.011

Review 8.  Rating the risk factors for breast cancer.

Authors:  S Eva Singletary
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 9.  Evaluation and management of high risk and premalignant lesions of the breast.

Authors:  D L Page; R A Jensen
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1994 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 10.  Anatomic indicators (histologic and cytologic) of increased breast cancer risk.

Authors:  D L Page; W D Dupont
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 4.872

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.