Literature DB >> 9051270

Developmental changes of RNA editing of glutamate receptor subunits GluR5 and GluR6: in vivo versus in vitro.

W Paschen1, J Schmitt, C Gissel, E Dux.   

Abstract

In the present series of experiments we compared the up-regulation of GluR5 and GluR6 mRNA editing during the transition from the embryonic to the adult state with changes in the extent of editing during neuronal development in vitro. RNA was isolated from rats, from the cerebral cortex, hippocampus and cerebellum of embryonic brains (E19) and adult brains (2 months old), as well as from neurons prepared from the cortex, hippocampus and cerebellum of embryonic brains (E19) and held in tissue culture for 2, 8 or 16 days. Quantification of mRNA editing was achieved by using standards prepared from plasmids with cDNA inserts derived from the edited and unedited state of both GluR5 and GluR6 mRNA. In addition, GluR5 mRNA levels were determined in brain tissue and neuronal cells in culture by quantitative PCR. Developmental changes in the extent of GluR5 and GluR6 mRNA editing were different in vivo compared to in vitro. For GluR5 mRNA editing these differences were most pronounced in cerebellar neurons compared to cerebellar tissue: the extent of GluR5 mRNA editing found in vivo at E19 was significantly down-regulated in cerebellar neurons during the first 8 days in culture, and after 16 days in vitro the extent of editing was still about 50% of that found in the adult state in vivo. For GluR6 mRNA editing these differences were most pronounced in hippocampal neurons compared to the hippocampus in vivo: the extent of GluR6 mRNA editing found in vivo at E19 was significantly down-regulated in vitro during the whole culturing period, most pronounced after 8 days in vivo (to below 40% of that found at E19 and to below 30% of that found in adult hippocampus). GluR5 mRNA levels increased markedly from E19 to the adult brain. However, we could not find any specific pattern of changes in mRNA levels which might account for the development changes in the profile of GluR5 mRNA editing. Comparing developmental changes in the extent of mRNA editing of glutamate receptor subunits may help to elucidate the molecular and regulatory mechanisms of this important editing reaction. Strict control and clear indication of the age of primary neuronal cell cultures used should be required in accounts of electrophysiological or neurotoxicological studies as this would increase comparative usefulness of such experiments, since calcium fluxes through glutamate receptor ion channels are likely to influence the system significantly.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9051270     DOI: 10.1016/s0165-3806(96)00193-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Res Dev Brain Res        ISSN: 0165-3806


  9 in total

1.  Kainate receptor RNA editing is markedly altered by acute spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Luca Caracciolo; Fabio Fumagalli; Stephana Carelli; Laura Madaschi; Luca La Via; Daniela Bonini; Chiara Fiorentini; Sergio Barlati; Alfredo Gorio; Alessandro Barbon
Journal:  J Mol Neurosci       Date:  2013-08-27       Impact factor: 3.444

Review 2.  The emerging role of RNA editing in plasticity.

Authors:  Joshua J C Rosenthal
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 3.312

3.  Transplanted neuroblasts differentiate appropriately into projection neurons with correct neurotransmitter and receptor phenotype in neocortex undergoing targeted projection neuron degeneration.

Authors:  J J Shin; R A Fricker-Gates; F A Perez; B R Leavitt; D Zurakowski; J D Macklis
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2000-10-01       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Fluoxetine affects GluK2 editing, glutamate-evoked Ca(2+) influx and extracellular signal-regulated kinase phosphorylation in mouse astrocytes.

Authors:  Baoman Li; Shiquen Zhang; Hongyan Zhang; Leif Hertz; Liang Peng
Journal:  J Psychiatry Neurosci       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 6.186

Review 5.  Structure, Function, and Pharmacology of Glutamate Receptor Ion Channels.

Authors:  Kasper B Hansen; Lonnie P Wollmuth; Derek Bowie; Hiro Furukawa; Frank S Menniti; Alexander I Sobolevsky; Geoffrey T Swanson; Sharon A Swanger; Ingo H Greger; Terunaga Nakagawa; Chris J McBain; Vasanthi Jayaraman; Chian-Ming Low; Mark L Dell'Acqua; Jeffrey S Diamond; Chad R Camp; Riley E Perszyk; Hongjie Yuan; Stephen F Traynelis
Journal:  Pharmacol Rev       Date:  2021-10       Impact factor: 18.923

6.  ADAR1 and ADAR2 expression and editing activity during forebrain development.

Authors:  Michelle M Jacobs; Rachel L Fogg; Ronald B Emeson; Gregg D Stanwood
Journal:  Dev Neurosci       Date:  2009-03-27       Impact factor: 2.984

7.  ADAR2-mediated Q/R editing of GluK2 regulates kainate receptor upscaling in response to suppression of synaptic activity.

Authors:  Sonam Gurung; Ashley J Evans; Kevin A Wilkinson; Jeremy M Henley
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  2018-12-17       Impact factor: 5.285

Review 8.  Regulation of Ion Channel and Transporter Function Through RNA Editing.

Authors:  Miguel Holmgren; Joshua J C Rosenthal
Journal:  Curr Issues Mol Biol       Date:  2014-10-27       Impact factor: 2.081

Review 9.  Adenosine-to-inosine RNA editing in neurological development and disease.

Authors:  Yuxi Yang; Shunpei Okada; Masayuki Sakurai
Journal:  RNA Biol       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 4.652

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.