Literature DB >> 9048689

Statistical assessment of ordinal outcomes in comparative studies.

S C Scott1, M S Goldberg, N E Mayo.   

Abstract

Ordinal regression is a relatively new statistical method developed for analyzing ranked outcomes. In the past, ranked scales have often been analyzed without making full use of the ordinality of the data or, alternatively, by assigning arbitrary numerical scores to the ranks. While ordinal regression models are now available to make full use of ranked data, they are not used widely. This article, directed to clinical researchers and epidemiologists, provides a description of the properties of these methods. Using ordinal measures of back pain in a follow-up study of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis, we illustrate the advantages of those methods and describe how to interpret the estimated parameters. Comparisons with binary logistic regression are made to show why a single dichotomization of the ordinal scale may lead to incorrect inferences. Two ordinal models (the proportional odds and the continuation ratio models) are discussed, and the goodness-of-fit of these models is examined. We conclude that ordinal regression is a tool that is powerful, simple to use, and produces an interpretable parameter that summarizes the effect between groups over all levels of the outcome.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9048689     DOI: 10.1016/s0895-4356(96)00312-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol        ISSN: 0895-4356            Impact factor:   6.437


  81 in total

1.  Sample size calculations in studies using the EuroQol 5D.

Authors:  M Roset; X Badia; N E Mayo
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  Confidence of academic general internists and family physicians to teach ambulatory procedures.

Authors:  G C Wickstrom; D K Kelley; T C Keyserling; M M Kolar; J G Dixon; S X Xie; C L Lewis; B A Bognar; C T DuPre; D R Coxe; J Hayden; M V Williams
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  Clinician's Commentary on Dang et al.(1).

Authors:  Nancy E Mayo
Journal:  Physiother Can       Date:  2011-08-10       Impact factor: 1.037

4.  Comparison of proportional and differential odds models for mixed-effects analysis of categorical data.

Authors:  Maria C Kjellsson; Per-Henrik Zingmark; E Niclas Jonsson; Mats O Karlsson
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2008-09-23       Impact factor: 2.745

5.  Annual average ambient particulate matter exposure estimates, measured home particulate matter, and hair nicotine are associated with respiratory outcomes in adults with asthma.

Authors:  John R Balmes; Miriam Cisternas; Patricia J Quinlan; Laura Trupin; Fred W Lurmann; Patricia P Katz; Paul D Blanc
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  2014-01-11       Impact factor: 6.498

6.  Race/ethnicity and multiple cancer risk factors among individuals seeking smoking cessation treatment.

Authors:  Darla E Kendzor; Tracy J Costello; Yisheng Li; Jennifer Irvin Vidrine; Carlos A Mazas; Lorraine R Reitzel; Paul M Cinciripini; Ludmila M Cofta-Woerpel; Michael S Businelle; David W Wetter
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 4.254

7.  A population-based study of blood lead levels in relation to depression in the United States.

Authors:  Natalia I Golub; Paul C Winters; Edwin van Wijngaarden
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2009-12-06       Impact factor: 3.015

8.  Response by Mistry et al to Letter Regarding Article, "Mechanical Thrombectomy in Patients With Ischemic Stroke With Prestroke Disability".

Authors:  Eva A Mistry; Sanjana Salwi; Shawna Cutting
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2020-08-24       Impact factor: 7.914

9.  Patterns of care at end of life for people with primary intracranial tumors: lessons learned.

Authors:  Abdulrahman Alturki; Bruno Gagnon; Kevin Petrecca; Susan C Scott; Lyne Nadeau; Nancy Mayo
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2014-01-28       Impact factor: 4.130

10.  Incorporating the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF) into an electronic health record to create indicators of function: proof of concept using the SF-12.

Authors:  Nancy E Mayo; Lise Poissant; Sara Ahmed; Lois Finch; Johanne Higgins; Nancy M Salbach; Judith Soicher; Susan Jaglal
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2004-08-06       Impact factor: 4.497

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.