Natalia I Golub1, Paul C Winters, Edwin van Wijngaarden. 1. Department of Community and Preventive Medicine, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, 601 Elmwood Avenue, Box 644, Rochester, NY 14642, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Lead is a known neurotoxicant. Several studies have suggested that occupational exposure to lead may lead to depression, anxiety and other psychiatric illness, but few studies have examined environmental lead exposure and depression. We evaluated the relationship between blood lead levels (BLL) and depression in a sample representative of the US population. METHODS: We analyzed data from 4,159 adults ages ≥20 who participated in the 2005-2006 cycle of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). Depression was assessed by the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9). Relative risks were calculated using Poisson regression, and odds ratios were calculated with ordinal logistic regression using SUDAAN, controlling for pertinent covariates. RESULTS: The risk of depression was only slightly elevated with increasing blood lead levels when lead was modeled as a categorical variable, with adjusted relative risks of 1.16 (95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.99-1.36), 1.20 (CI = 1.07-1.36) and 1.16 (CI = 0.87-1.54) for 0.89-1.40 μg/dL, 1.41-2.17 μg/dL and >2.17 μg/dL, respectively, when compared to 0-0.88 μg/dL using Poisson regression. Similar results were obtained with ordinal logistic regression. Analyses using BLL as a continuous variable did not show a significant relationship with depression. CONCLUSIONS: This cross-sectional study did not provide consistent evidence for an association between environmental lead exposure and depression within the investigated blood lead levels.
PURPOSE: Lead is a known neurotoxicant. Several studies have suggested that occupational exposure to lead may lead to depression, anxiety and other psychiatric illness, but few studies have examined environmental lead exposure and depression. We evaluated the relationship between blood lead levels (BLL) and depression in a sample representative of the US population. METHODS: We analyzed data from 4,159 adults ages ≥20 who participated in the 2005-2006 cycle of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). Depression was assessed by the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9). Relative risks were calculated using Poisson regression, and odds ratios were calculated with ordinal logistic regression using SUDAAN, controlling for pertinent covariates. RESULTS: The risk of depression was only slightly elevated with increasing blood lead levels when lead was modeled as a categorical variable, with adjusted relative risks of 1.16 (95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.99-1.36), 1.20 (CI = 1.07-1.36) and 1.16 (CI = 0.87-1.54) for 0.89-1.40 μg/dL, 1.41-2.17 μg/dL and >2.17 μg/dL, respectively, when compared to 0-0.88 μg/dL using Poisson regression. Similar results were obtained with ordinal logistic regression. Analyses using BLL as a continuous variable did not show a significant relationship with depression. CONCLUSIONS: This cross-sectional study did not provide consistent evidence for an association between environmental lead exposure and depression within the investigated blood lead levels.
Authors: Richard L Canfield; Charles R Henderson; Deborah A Cory-Slechta; Christopher Cox; Todd A Jusko; Bruce P Lanphear Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2003-04-17 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Ronald C Kessler; Patricia Berglund; Olga Demler; Robert Jin; Doreen Koretz; Kathleen R Merikangas; A John Rush; Ellen E Walters; Philip S Wang Journal: JAMA Date: 2003-06-18 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Ki-Do Eum; Susan A Korrick; Jennifer Weuve; Olivia Okereke; Laura D Kubzansky; Howard Hu; Marc G Weisskopf Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2012-02-29 Impact factor: 9.031