Literature DB >> 9048461

Using 45S5 bioglass cones as endosseous ridge maintenance implants to prevent alveolar ridge resorption: a 5-year evaluation.

H R Stanley1, M B Hall, A E Clark, C J King, L L Hench, J J Berte.   

Abstract

Bioglass cones acting as space fillers after removal of tooth roots delay the resorption of alveolar ridges. In 1987, 242 implants in 29 patients with a mean postimplantation interval of 19.9 months were reported by the authors. Bioglass cones had been fitted snugly at least 2 mm below the alveolar crest, and dentures were placed no sooner than 6 weeks following tooth removal; 2.9% had been lost and 3.7% developed dehiscences. The present report on 168 implants in 20 recalled patients (mean postimplantation interval of 63.2 months) revealed a loss of 14.3% of the implants and 7.7% of the implants requiring recontouring. Literature indicates highest survival rates for implants in the anterior mandible; however, the present data demonstrate a statistically significant retention rate in the anterior maxilla. With this high rate of Bioglass cone retention (85.7%) after 5 years, their placement into fresh sockets to maintain the alveolar ridge is recommended.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9048461

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants        ISSN: 0882-2786            Impact factor:   2.804


  11 in total

1.  The story of Bioglass.

Authors:  Larry L Hench
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2006-11-22       Impact factor: 3.896

Review 2.  Biomaterials in orthopaedics.

Authors:  M Navarro; A Michiardi; O Castaño; J A Planell
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2008-10-06       Impact factor: 4.118

3.  Preclinical experiments on the release behavior of biodegradable nanofibrous multipharmaceutical membranes in a model of four-wall intrabony defect.

Authors:  Dave Wei-Chih Chen; Fu-Ying Lee; Jun-Yi Liao; Shih-Jung Liu; Chao-Ying Hsiao; Jan-Kan Chen
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2012-09-04       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  Injectable bone substitute to preserve alveolar ridge resorption after tooth extraction: a study in dog.

Authors:  D Boix; P Weiss; O Gauthier; J Guicheux; J-M Bouler; P Pilet; G Daculsi; G Grimandi
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2006-11-22       Impact factor: 3.896

Review 5.  [Application and research status of bioactive glass in bone repair].

Authors:  Yonghua Huang; Li Li; Zhanying Shi; Xu Cui; Haobo Pan; Bing Li
Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2020-05-15

6.  Phosphorus Effects of Mesoporous Bioactive Glass on Occlude Exposed Dentin.

Authors:  Wen-Cheng Chen; Cheng-Hwei Chen; Jung-Chang Kung; Yu-Cheng Hsiao; Chi-Jen Shih; Chi-Sheng Chien
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2013-11-19       Impact factor: 3.623

Review 7.  Bioactive Glasses: Where Are We and Where Are We Going?

Authors:  Francesco Baino; Sepideh Hamzehlou; Saeid Kargozar
Journal:  J Funct Biomater       Date:  2018-03-19

Review 8.  Bioactive Glass and Silicate-Based Ceramic Coatings on Metallic Implants: Open Challenge or Outdated Topic?

Authors:  Giulia Brunello; Hamada Elsayed; Lisa Biasetto
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2019-09-10       Impact factor: 3.623

9.  Porous-wall hollow glass microspheres as novel potential nanocarriers for biomedical applications.

Authors:  Shuyi Li; Lynsa Nguyen; Hairong Xiong; Meiyao Wang; Tom C-C Hu; Jin-Xiong She; Steven M Serkiz; George G Wicks; William S Dynan
Journal:  Nanomedicine       Date:  2009-07-16       Impact factor: 5.307

Review 10.  Bioactive Glasses: Frontiers and Challenges.

Authors:  Larry L Hench; Julian R Jones
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2015-11-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.