| Literature DB >> 28788393 |
Wen-Cheng Chen1, Cheng-Hwei Chen2, Jung-Chang Kung3, Yu-Cheng Hsiao4, Chi-Jen Shih5, Chi-Sheng Chien6,7.
Abstract
In recent studies, sealing of exposed dentinal tubules is generally considered as one of the most effective strategies to treat dentin hypersensitivity. Mesoporous bioactive glass (MBG) is a potential material for treating dentin hypersensitivity due to its highly specific areas for dissolution and re-precipitated reaction for reduction in dentin permeability. The groups of commercial products of PerioGlas®, synthetic MBG and MBG without phosphorus (MBGNP) were compared. The MBG and MBGNP powders were prepared by the sol-gel method and mixed with different calculated ratios of phosphoric acid (PA) and then was brushed onto dentin surfaces. We used X-ray diffractometer (XRD), scanning electronic microscope (SEM), and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) to investigate the physiochemistry and the occlusion ability of dentinal tubules. The results showed that MBG paste mixed with PA solution has a better ability for occluding dentinal tubules than MBGNP; it has a short reaction time and good operability. The major crystallite phase of MBG agents was monocalcium phosphate monohydrate [Ca(H₂PO₄)₂·H₂O] in the early stages of the reactions. MBG pastes that were mixed with 30% and 40% PA had the ability to create excellent penetration depth greater than 80 μm. These agents have the potential to treat dentin hypersensitivity.Entities:
Keywords: dentin hypersensitivity; mesoporous bioactive glass; phosphoric acid
Year: 2013 PMID: 28788393 PMCID: PMC5452793 DOI: 10.3390/ma6115335
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
Figure 1The X-ray diffractometer (XRD) pattern and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) spectra of (a) PerioGlas (PG), (b) mesoporous bioactive glass (MBG), and (c) MBG without phosphorous (MBGNP) mixed with varied luting solutions for 10 min. The condition labels in figure are: (a) PG; (b) PG/W; (c) PG/PBS; (d) PG/20PA; (e) PG/30PA; (f) PG/40PA (the symbol of PG/ indicate the PG reacted with varied solutions: W: de-ionized water; PBS: phosphate buffered saline; 20, 30 and 40PA: 20, 30 and 40 wt % PA solution).
Figure 2SEM micrographs of dentin specimens for topographies of different materials of PG, MBG and MBGNP reacted with various hardening solutions for 5 min at a magnification of 1000×. (W: de-ionized water; 20PA, 30PA and 40 PA: respective 20, 30 and 40 wt % PA).
The percentage of tubule occlusion and the penetration depth of commercialized PG, synthetic MBG and MBG without phosphorus (MBGNP) based occlusive agents for 10 min mixing with hardening solution (n = 20).
| Occlusive agents mixed with varied hardening agents | PG | MBG | MBGNP | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Concentrations of phosphate (wt %) | 20PA | 30PA | 40PA | 20PA | 30PA | 40PA | 20PA | 30PA | 40PA |
| Percentage of tubule occlusion (%) | 13% | 13% | 0 a | 50% | 68% | 65% | 0% | 0% | 25% |
| Average of penetration depth (μm) | 68.2 | 74.1 | 0 | 68.4 | 71.5 | 73.1 | 0 | 0 | 50.8 |
| Standard deviation of penetration depth (μm) | 2.0 | 2.1 | 0 | 9.2 | 11.1 | 9.4 | 0 | 0 | 7.2 |
a indicated the materials existed no efficiency to occlude and penetrate.
Figure 3SEM micrographs of dentinal tubules cross-sectional morphologies treated with different materials of PG, MBG and MBGNP reacted with various hardening solutions for 5 min at a magnification of 1000×. (W: de-ionized water; 20PA, 30PA and 40PA: respective 20, 30 and 40 wt % PA).
Figure 4Nitrogen adsorption/desorption isotherm and the Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) surface area with pore volume of MBG and MBGNP.
Figure 5Nitrogen adsorption/desorption isotherm and the BET surface area with pore volume of MBG before and after mixed with 30% PA.
Sources of materials.
| Materials | formula | Company | Purity (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pluronic F-127 | EO106–PO70–EO106 | BASF | – |
| Polyurethane foam | – | – | – |
| Calcium nitrate tetrahydrate | Ca(NO3)2·4H2O | SHOWA | 98.5 |
| Triethyl phosphate | C6H15O4P | HANAWA | 98.0 |
| Tetraethyl orthosilicate | C8H20O4Si | ACROS | 98.0 |
| Hydrochloric acid | HCl | Riedel-de Haen | 98.0 |
| Ethanol | C2H5OH | J. T. Baker | 99.9 |
| Phosphoric acid | H3PO4 | SHIMAKYU | 98.0 |
Figure 6Examples of SEM mapping the occlusion calculated for the (a) occlusion rate and (b) penetration depth.