Literature DB >> 9048439

Sensory modulation and behavioral choice during feeding in the Australian frog, Cyclorana novaehollandiae.

C M Valdez1, K C Nishikawa.   

Abstract

This study investigates how visual and tactile sensory information, as well as biomechanical effects due to differences in physical characteristics of the prey, influence feeding behavior in the frog Cyclorana novaehollandiae. Video motion analysis was used to quantify movement patterns produced when feeding on five prey types (termites, waxworms, crickets, mice and earthworms). Twelve kinematic variables differed significantly among prey types, and twelve variables were correlated with prey characteristics (including mass, length, height and velocity of movement). Results indicate that C. novaehollandiae uses a different strategy to capture each prey type. Visual assessment of prey characteristics appeared to be more important in modulating feeding behavior that tactile cues or biomechanical effects. We propose a hierarchical hypothesis of behavioral choice, in which decisions are based primarily on visual analysis of prey characteristics. In this model, the frogs first choose between jaw prehension and tongue prehension based on prey size. If they have chosen jaw prehension, they next choose between upward or downward head rotation based on length and height of the prey. If they have chosen tongue prehension, they next choose between behavior for fast and slow prey. Final decisions may be the result of behavioral fine tuning based on tactile feedback.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9048439     DOI: 10.1007/s003590050040

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comp Physiol A            Impact factor:   1.836


  4 in total

1.  Neuromuscular control of prey capture in frogs.

Authors:  K C Nishikawa
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1999-05-29       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Separating the effects of prey size and speed on the kinematics of prey capture in the omnivorous lizard Gerrhosaurus major.

Authors:  Stéphane J Montuelle; Anthony Herrel; Paul-Antoine Libourel; Lionel Reveret; Vincent L Bels
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2010-06-03       Impact factor: 1.836

3.  The roles of visual and proprioceptive information during motor program choice in frogs.

Authors:  C W Anderson; K C Nishikawa
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 1.836

4.  Prey location, biomechanical constraints, and motor program choice during prey capture in the tomato frog, Dyscophus guineti.

Authors:  Jenna A Monroy; Kiisa C Nishikawa
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2009-08-06       Impact factor: 1.836

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.