Literature DB >> 8956496

The roles of visual and proprioceptive information during motor program choice in frogs.

C W Anderson1, K C Nishikawa.   

Abstract

Previous studies have shown that leopard frogs, Rana pipiens, use tongue prehension to capture small prey and jaw prehension to capture large prey. After hypoglossal nerve transection, the frogs fail to open their mouths when attempting to feed on small prey, but open their mouths and capture large prey. Here, we investigate how visual information about the prey and proprioceptive information from the tongue interact to influence the motor program choice. Using pieces of earthworm of various sizes, we found that Rana exhibits two different behavior patterns based on prey size. The frogs captured the 1.5-cm prey using tongue prehension, whereas 2.0-cm and larger prey were captured using jaw prehension. After hypoglossal transection, the frogs never opened their mouths when they tried to feed on 1.5-cm prey. When feeding on 3.0-cm and larger prey after transection, they always opened their mouths and captured the prey using jaw prehension. When offered 2.0-cm prey, they alternated randomly between opening and not opening the mouth. Therefore, deafferentation changed the pattern of motor program choice at the behavioral border. This implies that afferents from the tongue interact with visual input to influence motor program choice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8956496     DOI: 10.1007/bf00207354

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comp Physiol A            Impact factor:   1.836


  9 in total

1.  The evolution of neural circuits controlling feeding behavior in frogs.

Authors:  K C Nishikawa; C W Anderson; S M Deban; J C O'Reilly
Journal:  Brain Behav Evol       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 1.808

2.  Perception of apparent motion in the common toad.

Authors:  W KAESS; F KAESS
Journal:  Science       Date:  1960-10-07       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Sensory modulation and behavioral choice during feeding in the Australian frog, Cyclorana novaehollandiae.

Authors:  C M Valdez; K C Nishikawa
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 1.836

Review 4.  Spinal cord circuits for motor pattern selection in the turtle.

Authors:  P S Stein
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 5.691

5.  Simultaneous control of two rhythmical behaviors. I. Locomotion with paw-shake response in normal cat.

Authors:  M C Carter; J L Smith
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1986-07       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 6.  Common principles of motor control in vertebrates and invertebrates.

Authors:  K G Pearson
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 12.449

7.  A prey-type dependent hypoglossal feedback system in the frog Rana pipiens.

Authors:  C W Anderson; K C Nishikawa
Journal:  Brain Behav Evol       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 1.808

8.  Local motion processing in the optic tectum of the Japanese toad, Bufo japonicus.

Authors:  M Satou; A Shiraishi
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 1.836

9.  The role of hypoglossal sensory feedback during feeding in the marine toad, Bufo marinus.

Authors:  K C Nishikawa; C Gans
Journal:  J Exp Zool       Date:  1992-12-01
  9 in total
  3 in total

1.  Neuromuscular control of prey capture in frogs.

Authors:  K C Nishikawa
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1999-05-29       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Anatomical organization of brainstem circuits mediating feeding motor programs in the marine toad, Bufo marinus.

Authors:  Rakesh Mandal; Curtis W Anderson
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2009-08-22       Impact factor: 3.252

3.  Prey location, biomechanical constraints, and motor program choice during prey capture in the tomato frog, Dyscophus guineti.

Authors:  Jenna A Monroy; Kiisa C Nishikawa
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2009-08-06       Impact factor: 1.836

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.