Literature DB >> 9043908

Are there any predictive factors for successful testicular sperm recovery in azoospermic patients?

H Tournaye1, G Verheyen, P Nagy, F Ubaldi, A Goossens, S Silber, A C Van Steirteghem, P Devroey.   

Abstract

Recovery of testicular spermatozoa from azoospermic patients with testicular failure followed by intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) is a recent advance in the treatment of male infertility. This study aimed at investigating which parameter(s) may predict successful testicular sperm recovery. We reviewed 395 testicular sperm recovery procedures and analysed the most frequently available parameters for clinical decision-making in azoospermic patients: (i) presence of at least one single spermatozoon in at least one preliminary semen analysis; (ii) maximum testicular volume; (iii) serum follicle stimulating hormone (FSH); and (iv) presence of spermatozoa in the histology of a randomly-taken testicular biopsy. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value, positive and negative likelihood ratio and accuracy were calculated for the above index parameters in different clinically relevant subgroups using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves whenever possible. Spermatozoa were always successfully recovered in patients with normal testicular histological findings (n = 173) or hypospermatogenesis (n = 16) but not in some patients with tubular sclerosis (seven out of 18), Sertoli cell-only pattern (55 out of 112) or maturation arrest (39 out of 76). Histopathology was the best test for predicting successful sperm recovery in the whole population (sensitivity: 86%, specificity: 93%, accuracy: 0.87). In patients with secretory azoospermia, histopathology was again the most accurate parameter (accuracy: 0.74), especially in patients showing Sertoli cell-only pattern (accuracy: 0.83) but not in patients showing maturation arrest (accuracy: 0.55). In patients with serum FSH concentrations > 12 IU/l and maximum testicular volume < 15 ml, histopathology was not found to be accurate. Semen analysis, maximum testicular volume and serum FSH were not highly predictive in all subgroups studied. Our analysis shows that no strong predictors for successful testicular sperm recovery are available except for testicular histopathology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9043908     DOI: 10.1093/humrep/12.1.80

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  54 in total

1.  Predictive factors for motile sperm recovery using testicular biopsy in nonobstructive azoospermic patients.

Authors:  C A B Souza; J S Cunha Filho; D Santos; A Gratão; F M Freitas; E P Passos
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 2.370

2.  Tissue perfusion essential for spermatogenesis and outcome of testicular sperm extraction (TESE) for assisted reproduction.

Authors:  R Herwig; K Tosun; G M Pinggera; E Soelder; K T Moeller; L Pallwein; E Frauscher; G Bartsch; L Wildt; K Illmensee
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 3.  Surgical recovery of sperm in non-obstructive azoospermia.

Authors:  Tomomoto Ishikawa
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2011-11-28       Impact factor: 3.285

4.  Impact of age, follicle stimulating hormone and Johnsen's score on successful sperm retrieval by microdissection testicular sperm extraction.

Authors:  Akira Tsujimura; Yasushi Miyagawa; Tetsuya Takao; Kazutoshi Fujita; Kazuhiko Komori; Yasuhiro Matsuoka; Shingo Takada; Minoru Koga; Masami Takeyama; Hideki Fujioka; Kiyomi Matsumiya; Akihiko Okuyama
Journal:  Reprod Med Biol       Date:  2005-03-07

5.  Effects of clinical, laboratuary and pathological features on successful sperm retrieval in non-obstructive azoospermia.

Authors:  Çağrı Güneri; Turgut Alkibay; Lütfi Tunç
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2016-09

6.  Seven pregnancies and deliveries from non-mosaic Klinefelter syndrome patients using fresh and frozen testicular sperm.

Authors:  Koichi Kyono; Hirofumi Uto; Yukiko Nakajo; Shima Kumagai; Yasuhisa Araki; Satoru Kanto
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2006-12-20       Impact factor: 3.412

7.  Sperm recovery prediction in azoospermic patients using Doppler ultrasonography.

Authors:  C A B Souza; J S L Cunha-Filho; P Fagundes; F M Freitas; E P Passos
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 2.370

8.  Sperm retrieval, fertilization, and pregnancy outcome in repeated testicular sperm aspiration.

Authors:  G Westlander; B Rosenlund; B Söderlund; M Wood; C Bergh
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 3.412

9.  Testicular histology may predict the successful sperm retrieval in patients with non-obstructive azoospermia undergoing conventional TESE: a diagnostic accuracy study.

Authors:  Ettore Caroppo; Elisabetta M Colpi; Giacomo Gazzano; Liborio Vaccalluzzo; Fabrizio I Scroppo; Giuseppe D'Amato; Giovanni M Colpi
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2016-09-21       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 10.  Sperm retrieval techniques.

Authors:  Daniel H Shin; Paul J Turek
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2013-12-03       Impact factor: 14.432

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.