Literature DB >> 32351316

Impact of age, follicle stimulating hormone and Johnsen's score on successful sperm retrieval by microdissection testicular sperm extraction.

Akira Tsujimura1, Yasushi Miyagawa1, Tetsuya Takao1, Kazutoshi Fujita1, Kazuhiko Komori1, Yasuhiro Matsuoka1, Shingo Takada1, Minoru Koga2, Masami Takeyama2, Hideki Fujioka3, Kiyomi Matsumiya1, Akihiko Okuyama1.   

Abstract

Background:  The spermatozoa retrieval rate achieved by microdissection testicular sperm extraction (TESE) for patients with non-obstructive azoospermia is still approximately 50%, despite technical advances. Predicting a successful outcome is important to avoid unnecessary surgery. A study was conducted to determine a method for calculating the predicted probability of successful microdissection TESE.
Methods:   Testicular spermatozoa were retrieved in 41 of 100 patients by microdissection TESE. Ten clinical factors were examined in the search for an optimal logistic model for predicting a good outcome. Once the best delimiting value was established, sensitivity and specificity were calculated.
Results:Patient age, serum follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) concentration and Johnsen's score (JS) were shown to be influential factors by multivariate logistic analysis. The mathematical model for predicting the probability of a successful outcome was as follows: P = (1 + exp[0.144 × patient age - 0.059 × serum FSH concentration - 1.310 × JS])-1. When a predictive probability of 49.7% was selected as the best cut-off value, sensitivity and specificity were 78.0% and 76.3%, respectively.
Conclusion:   This present model is very useful for predicting successful microdissection TESE. In addition, we suggest that a younger patient age would increase the probability of success with this procedure. (Reprod Med Biol 2005; 4: 53-57).

Entities:  

Keywords:  age; microdissection testicular sperm extraction; non‐obstructive azoospermia; predictive model; testicular histology

Year:  2005        PMID: 32351316      PMCID: PMC7187778          DOI: 10.1111/j.1447-0578.2005.00082.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Reprod Med Biol        ISSN: 1445-5781


  27 in total

1.  Microdissection TESE: sperm retrieval in non-obstructive azoospermia.

Authors:  P N Schlegel; P S Li
Journal:  Hum Reprod Update       Date:  1998 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 15.610

2.  Conventional multiple or microdissection testicular sperm extraction: a comparative study.

Authors:  A Tsujimura; K Matsumiya; Y Miyagawa; A Tohda; H Miura; K Nishimura; M Koga; M Takeyama; H Fujioka; A Okuyama
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 6.918

3.  Prospective comparative study between microsurgical and conventional testicular sperm extraction in non-obstructive azoospermia: follow-up by serial ultrasound examinations.

Authors:  M Amer; A Ateyah; R Hany; W Zohdy
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 6.918

Review 4.  Are spermatid injections of any clinical value? ROSNI and ROSI revisited. Round spermatid nucleus injection and round spermatid injection.

Authors:  S J Silber; L Johnson
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 6.918

Review 5.  Criteria predicting the absence of spermatozoa in the Sertoli cell-only syndrome can be used to improve success rates of sperm retrieval.

Authors:  R Anniballo; F Ubaldi; L Cobellis; M Sorrentino; L Rienzi; E Greco; J Tesarik
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 6.918

6.  Induction of apoptosis in the germ cells of adult male rats after exposure to cyclophosphamide.

Authors:  L Cai; B F Hales; B Robaire
Journal:  Biol Reprod       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 4.285

7.  Spermatogonial proliferation and apoptosis in hypospermatogenesis associated with nonobstructive azoospermia.

Authors:  S Takagi; N Itoh; M Kimura; T Sasao; T Tsukamoto
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 7.329

8.  Reconsideration of testicular biopsy and follicle-stimulating hormone measurement in the era of intracytoplasmic sperm injection for non-obstructive azoospermia?

Authors:  C S Chen; S H Chu; Y M Lai; M L Wang; P R Chan
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 6.918

Review 9.  Evaluation of the human testis and its age-related dysfunction.

Authors:  L Johnson
Journal:  Prog Clin Biol Res       Date:  1989

10.  Prediction of successful outcome of microdissection testicular sperm extraction in men with idiopathic nonobstructive azoospermia.

Authors:  Akira Tsujimura; Kiyomi Matsumiya; Yasushi Miyagawa; Tetsuya Takao; Kazutoshi Fujita; Minoru Koga; Masami Takeyama; Hideki Fujioka; Akihiko Okuyama
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 7.450

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  [Testicular sperm extraction in male infertility : Indications, success rates, practical implementation, and possible complications].

Authors:  J Rosellen; J Steffens; J Kranz
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2021-03-03       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 2.  Hormonal Treatment of Men with Nonobstructive Azoospermia: What Does the Evidence Suggest?

Authors:  Ettore Caroppo; Giovanni M Colpi
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-01-20       Impact factor: 4.241

Review 3.  Predictors of testicular sperm retrieval in patients with non-obstructive azoospermia: a review.

Authors:  Lin Qi; Ya P Liu; Nan N Zhang; Ying C Su
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2021-04       Impact factor: 1.671

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.