Literature DB >> 9043471

Conservative surgery for infiltrating lobular breast carcinoma.

B Salvadori1, E Biganzoli, P Veronesi, R Saccozzi, F Rilke.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Some reports state that infiltrating lobular breast carcinoma (ILC) should not be treated by conservative methods because of a high risk of local recurrence. The aim of this study was to determine whether patients with conservatively treated ILC have a higher risk of intrabreast relapse than those with infiltrating ductal carcinoma (IDC).
METHODS: Some 286 consecutive patients with ILC of the breast were compared with 1903 women with IDC treated at the Istituto Nazionale per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori, Milan, over the same interval (1973-1989). Patients in both series received the same treatment: quadrantectomy, complete axillary dissection and radiotherapy to the breast. Adjuvant treatment was administered according to nodal and menopausal status (chemotherapy or tamoxifen). Follow-up lasted until December 1994, with a median of 137 months for patients with ILC and 133 for those with IDC. Histology slides were reviewed to assess the presence of multifocality (ILC 4.5 per cent versus IDC 3.6 per cent and extensive intraduct component (ILC 0.3) per cent versus IDC 6.4 per cent).
RESULTS: No difference in cumulative local recurrence rate was found between the two groups at 10 years (approximately 7 per cent).
CONCLUSION: Conservative surgery is equally safe for patients with infiltrating lobular or ductal carcinoma of the breast.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9043471

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Surg        ISSN: 0007-1323            Impact factor:   6.939


  6 in total

1.  Outcomes After Accelerated Partial Breast Irradiation in Women With Triple Negative Subtype and Other "High Risk" Variables Categorized as Cautionary in The ASTRO Guidelines.

Authors:  Anabel Goulding; Lina Asmar; Yunfei Wang; Shannon Tole; Lora Barke; Jodi Widner; Charles Leonard
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-03-11       Impact factor: 6.244

2.  Margin assessment after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in invasive lobular cancer.

Authors:  Jamie Wagner; Judy C Boughey; Betsy Garrett; Gildy Babiera; Henry Kuerer; Funda Meric-Bernstam; Eva Singletary; Kelly K Hunt; Lavinia P Middleton; Isabelle Bedrosian
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2009-04-10       Impact factor: 2.565

3.  Comparison of mastectomy with breast-conserving surgery in invasive lobular carcinoma: 15-Year results.

Authors:  János Fodor; Tibor Major; József Tóth; Zoltán Sulyok; Csaba Polgár
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2011-07-27

4.  Predictors of Surgery Types after Neoadjuvant Therapy for Advanced Stage Breast Cancer: Analysis from Florida Population-Based Cancer Registry (1996-2009).

Authors:  Jamila Al-Azhri; Tulay Koru-Sengul; Feng Miao; Constantine Saclarides; Margaret M Byrne; Eli Avisar
Journal:  Breast Cancer (Auckl)       Date:  2015-12-13

5.  Present and changing trends in surgical modalities and neoadjuvant chemotherapy administration for female breast cancer in Beijing, China: A 10-year (2006-2015) retrospective hospitalization summary report-based study.

Authors:  Xiaoyuan Bao; Kexin Sun; Xin Tian; Qiongzhou Yin; Meng Jin; Na Yu; Hanfang Jiang; Jun Zhang; Yonghua Hu
Journal:  Thorac Cancer       Date:  2018-04-06       Impact factor: 3.500

6.  A comparison of the clinical outcomes of patients with invasive lobular carcinoma and invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast according to molecular subtype in a Korean population.

Authors:  Seung Taek Lim; Jong Han Yu; Heung Kyu Park; Byung In Moon; Byung Kyun Ko; Young Jin Suh
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2014-03-13       Impact factor: 2.754

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.