Literature DB >> 9043077

Analysis of Hoxd-13 and Hoxd-11 misexpression in chick limb buds reveals that Hox genes affect both bone condensation and growth.

D J Goff1, C J Tabin.   

Abstract

Hox genes are important regulators of limb pattern in vertebrate development. Misexpression of Hox genes in chicks using retroviral vectors provides an opportunity to analyze gain-of-function phenotypes and to assess their modes of action. Here we report the misexpression phenotype for Hoxd-13 and compare it to the misexpression phenotype of Hoxd-11. Hoxd-13 misexpression in the hindlimb results in a shortening of the long bones, including the femur, the tibia, the fibula and the tarsometatarsals. Mutations in an alanine repeat region in the N-terminus of Hoxd-13 have recently been implicated in human synpolydactyly (Muragaki, Y., Mundlos, S., Upton, J. and Olsen, B. R. (1996) Science 272, 548-551). N-terminal truncations of Hoxd-13 which lack this repeat were constructed and were found to produce a similar, although slightly milder, misexpression phenotype than the full-length Hoxd-13. The stage of bone development regulated by Hox genes has not previously been examined. The changes in bone lengths caused by Hoxd-13 misexpression are late phenotypes that first become apparent during the growth phase of the bones. Analysis of tritiated thymidine uptake by the tibia and fibula demonstrates that Hox genes can pattern the limb skeleton by regulating the rates of cell division in the proliferative zone of growing cartilage. Hoxd-11, in contrast to Hoxd-13, acts both at the initial cartilage condensation phase in the foot and during the later growth phase in the lower leg. Ectopic Hoxd-13 appears to act in a dominant negative manner in regions where it is not normally expressed. We propose a model in which all Hox genes are growth promoters, regulating the expression of the same target genes, with some Hox genes being more effective promoters of growth than other Hox genes. According to this model, the overall rate of growth in a given region is the result of the combined action of all of the Hox genes expressed in that region competing for the same target genes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9043077     DOI: 10.1242/dev.124.3.627

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Development        ISSN: 0950-1991            Impact factor:   6.868


  37 in total

1.  Differential and common leukemogenic potentials of multiple NUP98-Hox fusion proteins alone or with Meis1.

Authors:  Nicolas Pineault; Carolina Abramovich; Hideaki Ohta; R Keith Humphries
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 4.272

2.  Synpolydactyly phenotypes correlate with size of expansions in HOXD13 polyalanine tract.

Authors:  F R Goodman; S Mundlos; Y Muragaki; D Donnai; M L Giovannucci-Uzielli; E Lapi; F Majewski; J McGaughran; C McKeown; W Reardon; J Upton; R M Winter; B R Olsen; P J Scambler
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1997-07-08       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  Molecular basis for skeletal variation: insights from developmental genetic studies in mice.

Authors:  C Kappen; A Neubüser; R Balling; R Finnell
Journal:  Birth Defects Res B Dev Reprod Toxicol       Date:  2007-12

4.  In ovo application of antagomiRs indicates a role for miR-196 in patterning the chick axial skeleton through Hox gene regulation.

Authors:  Edwina McGlinn; Soraya Yekta; Jennifer H Mansfield; Jürgen Soutschek; David P Bartel; Clifford J Tabin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-10-21       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 5.  The power and perils of animal models with urogenital anomalies: handle with care.

Authors:  J M Hutson; L S Baskin; G Risbridger; G R Cunha
Journal:  J Pediatr Urol       Date:  2014-04-12       Impact factor: 1.830

6.  Deletions in HOXD13 segregate with an identical, novel foot malformation in two unrelated families.

Authors:  F Goodman; M L Giovannucci-Uzielli; C Hall; W Reardon; R Winter; P Scambler
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 11.025

7.  Regulation of number and size of digits by posterior Hox genes: a dose-dependent mechanism with potential evolutionary implications.

Authors:  J Zákány; C Fromental-Ramain; X Warot; D Duboule
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1997-12-09       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 8.  Role of Hox genes in stem cell differentiation.

Authors:  Anne Seifert; David F Werheid; Silvana M Knapp; Edda Tobiasch
Journal:  World J Stem Cells       Date:  2015-04-26       Impact factor: 5.326

9.  Hox genes regulate digit patterning by controlling the wavelength of a Turing-type mechanism.

Authors:  Rushikesh Sheth; Luciano Marcon; M Félix Bastida; Marisa Junco; Laura Quintana; Randall Dahn; Marie Kmita; James Sharpe; Maria A Ros
Journal:  Science       Date:  2012-12-14       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Morpholino-mediated knockdown in primary chondrocytes implicates Hoxc8 in regulation of cell cycle progression.

Authors:  Suzan Kamel; Claudia Kruger; J Michael Salbaum; Claudia Kappen
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2008-11-21       Impact factor: 4.398

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.