OBJECTIVE: (1) Examine systematic biases created by subjects lost at 1-year follow-up in samples of persons with traumatic brain injury; (2) identify potential threats to generalization of outcomes data. DESIGN: A consecutive sample of admissions to acute rehabilitation studied 1 year following discharge. SETTING: An inpatient brain injury rehabilitation unit in a large, academic medical center. SUBJECTS: Eighty-eight patients with primary diagnosis of traumatic brain injury. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Subjects were considered lost to follow-up when phone calls, mail, clinic visits, and assistance from family failed to allow contact 1 year after discharge from acute rehabilitation. Potential effects of the biased follow-up sample were examined for seven suboptimal outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 38.6% of subjects were lost to follow-up. Subjects intoxicated at time of injury and those with history of substance abuse were more-likely to be lost. Among subjects followed, the likelihood of working or being in school 1 year after discharge was significantly less for those intoxicated at time of injury and those with a history of substance abuse. CONCLUSIONS: Systematic bias in longitudinal studies may result from subjects with substance use problems being lost to follow-up. Population estimates for return to work or school will be overestimated if those lost who have substance use problems resemble those followed.
OBJECTIVE: (1) Examine systematic biases created by subjects lost at 1-year follow-up in samples of persons with traumatic brain injury; (2) identify potential threats to generalization of outcomes data. DESIGN: A consecutive sample of admissions to acute rehabilitation studied 1 year following discharge. SETTING: An inpatient brain injury rehabilitation unit in a large, academic medical center. SUBJECTS: Eighty-eight patients with primary diagnosis of traumatic brain injury. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Subjects were considered lost to follow-up when phone calls, mail, clinic visits, and assistance from family failed to allow contact 1 year after discharge from acute rehabilitation. Potential effects of the biased follow-up sample were examined for seven suboptimal outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 38.6% of subjects were lost to follow-up. Subjects intoxicated at time of injury and those with history of substance abuse were more-likely to be lost. Among subjects followed, the likelihood of working or being in school 1 year after discharge was significantly less for those intoxicated at time of injury and those with a history of substance abuse. CONCLUSIONS: Systematic bias in longitudinal studies may result from subjects with substance use problems being lost to follow-up. Population estimates for return to work or school will be overestimated if those lost who have substance use problems resemble those followed.
Authors: Charles H Bombardier; Jesse R Fann; Nancy R Temkin; Peter C Esselman; Jason Barber; Sureyya S Dikmen Journal: JAMA Date: 2010-05-19 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Adrian M Svingos; Steven A Robicsek; Ronald L Hayes; Kevin K Wang; Claudia S Robertson; Gretchen M Brophy; Linda Papa; Andrea Gabrielli; H Julia Hannay; Russell M Bauer; Shelley C Heaton Journal: Neurocrit Care Date: 2022-03-01 Impact factor: 3.532
Authors: Carlos D Marquez de la Plata; Tessa Hart; Flora M Hammond; Alan B Frol; Anne Hudak; Caryn R Harper; Therese M O'Neil-Pirozzi; John Whyte; Mary Carlile; Ramon Diaz-Arrastia Journal: Arch Phys Med Rehabil Date: 2008-05 Impact factor: 3.966
Authors: Susan D Horn; John D Corrigan; Cynthia L Beaulieu; Jennifer Bogner; Ryan S Barrett; Clare G Giuffrida; David K Ryser; Kelli Cooper; Deborah M Carroll; Daniel Deutscher Journal: Arch Phys Med Rehabil Date: 2015-08 Impact factor: 3.966
Authors: Jessica M Ketchum; Mitch Sevigny; Tessa Hart; Therese M O'Neil-Pirozzi; Angelle M Sander; Shannon B Juengst; Thomas F Bergquist; Laura E Dreer; Gale G Whiteneck Journal: J Head Trauma Rehabil Date: 2020 Jul/Aug Impact factor: 3.117