Literature DB >> 9040686

Correlation of peak systolic velocity and angiographic measurement of carotid stenosis revisited.

A V Alexandrov1, D S Brodie, A McLean, P Hamilton, J Murphy, P N Burns.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: Recent observations from the North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial (NASCET) questioned the reliability of peak systolic velocity (PSV) criteria for grading carotid stenosis. We compared PSV and angiographic measurements at our center together with known physiological relationships to investigate the accuracy of ultrasound.
METHODS: Consecutive patients who underwent both color-coded duplex ultrasound and intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography were studied. PSV was determined with angle correction at the site of the tightest internal carotid artery narrowing. Carotid stenosis was measured on angiograms with the North American (N) and common carotid (C) methods. Variables for the stepwise multiple linear regression analysis were selected from an axisymmetrical flow model.
RESULTS: Eighty bifurcations were imaged in 40 patients. PSV did not exceed 140 cm/s in normal vessels. In diseased arteries, PSV increased proportionally with increasing stenosis and decreased to 0 cm/s at occlusion. In stepwise selection of polynomial terms, the linear, quadratic, and cubic correlations of .38, .17, and .22 for N and .45, .24, and .03 for C were found to be significant (P < .02). When only stenosed vessels were evaluated, PSV increase was found with greater scatter for the N measurement: r2 = .73 for N and r2 = .85 for C (n = 50; P = .03 for the difference between two correlated correlation coefficients).
CONCLUSIONS: At our laboratory PSV consistently correlates well with N and C angiographic measurements, as determined with a simple flow model. The complex nature of these correlations and greater variability of the N measurement should be taken into account when data from different centers are compared.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9040686     DOI: 10.1161/01.str.28.2.339

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stroke        ISSN: 0039-2499            Impact factor:   7.914


  10 in total

1.  Transcranial Doppler screening in sickle cell disease: The implications of using peak systolic criteria.

Authors:  Lena N Naffaa; Yasmeen K Tandon; Neville Irani
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2015-02-28

2.  Reappraisal of flow velocity ratio in common carotid artery to predict hemodynamic change in carotid stenosis.

Authors:  Masahiro Kamouchi; Kazuhiro Kishikawa; Yasushi Okada; Tooru Inoue; Setsuro Ibayashi; Mitsuo Iida
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 3.825

3.  Risk factors for periprocedural complications in carotid artery stenting without filter protection: A serial diffusion-weighted MRI study.

Authors:  Hilmar Krapf; Thomas Nägele; Andreas Kastrup; Udo Bühring; Eckehard Grönewäller; Martin Skalej; Wilhelm Küker
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2005-10-01       Impact factor: 4.849

Review 4.  Applications of transcranial Doppler in the ICU: a review.

Authors:  Hayden White; Balasubramanian Venkatesh
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2006-05-10       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 5.  Duplex ultrasound for diagnosing symptomatic carotid stenosis in the extracranial segments.

Authors:  Nicolle Cassola; Jose Cc Baptista-Silva; Luis Cu Nakano; Carolina Dq Flumignan; Ricardo Sesso; Vladimir Vasconcelos; Nelson Carvas Junior; Ronald Lg Flumignan
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2022-07-11

6.  Halting the effects of flow enhancement with effective intermittent zeugmatographic encoding (HEFEWEIZEN) in SSFP.

Authors:  Jamal J Derakhshan; Mark A Griswold; Jeffrey L Sunshine; Jeffrey L Duerk
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 7.  Indications for carotid artery surgery and stent: the role of carotid ultrasound.

Authors:  Yong Jae Kim; Charles H Tegeler
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 2.931

8.  The ARTICO study: identification of patients at high risk of vascular recurrence after a first non-cardioembolic stroke.

Authors:  Joaquín Serena; Tomás Segura; Jaume Roquer; María García-Gil; José Castillo
Journal:  BMC Neurol       Date:  2015-03-11       Impact factor: 2.474

9.  The prognostic value of biomarkers in stroke.

Authors:  Francesco Iemolo; Enzo Sanzaro; Giovanni Duro; Antonello Giordano; Maurizio Paciaroni
Journal:  Immun Ageing       Date:  2016-05-31       Impact factor: 6.400

10.  Increased carotid artery stiffness after preeclampsia in a cross-sectional study of postpartum women.

Authors:  Logan C Barr; Julia E Herr; Marie-France Hétu; Graeme N Smith; Amer M Johri
Journal:  Physiol Rep       Date:  2022-04
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.