Literature DB >> 9039601

Performance of Gd-EOB-DTPA and superparamagnetic iron oxide particles in the detection of primary liver cancer: a comparative study by alternative free-response receiver operating characteristic analysis.

A Tanimoto1, Y Satoh, Y Yuasa, M Jinzaki, K Hiramatsu.   

Abstract

The performance of gadolinium-ethoxybenzyl-diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid (Gd-EOB-DTPA) and superparamagnetic iron oxide (SPIO) particles in detecting liver cancer was compared using alternative free-response receiver operating characteristic (AFROC) analysis, which allowed observers to indicate both the confidence level and the locations of all perceived abnormalities. Axial T1-weighted MR images (1.5 T) pre/post Gd-EOB-DTPA (25 mumol/kg) injection were obtained for 12 rats with chemically induced liver tumors (64 tumors). T2-weighted images (T2WI) were obtained pre/post SPIO (10 mumol/kg) injection for the same animal. Liver signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), tumor-liver contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), and histopathologic sections corresponding to MR images were obtained. In AFROC, the location and the confidence level for each tumor were indicated independently on MR images by four radiologists. By plotting true-positive fraction and probability of false-positive per image, the area under the AFROC curve (A1) was estimated and statistically analyzed between each sequence. Either drug significantly improved tumor-liver CNR (P < .001) and tumor detection (diameter < or = 6 mm; P < .05). Gd-EOB-DTPA significantly (P < .05) improved the A1 in T1WI. There was no A1 difference between T2WI + SPIO and T1WI + Gd-EOB-DTPA. Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced T1WI showed the same performance as SPIO-enhanced T2WI in detecting liver tumors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9039601     DOI: 10.1002/jmri.1880070116

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging        ISSN: 1053-1807            Impact factor:   4.813


  4 in total

Review 1.  [Current status of MRI diagnostics with liver-specific contrast agents. Gd-EOB-DTPA and Gd-BOPTA].

Authors:  C Stroszczynski; G Gaffke; M Gnauck; F Streitparth; G Wieners; E Lopez-Häninnen
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 0.635

2.  Diagnostic efficacy of gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI in the detection of hepatocellular carcinomas: comparison with gadopentetate dimeglumine.

Authors:  G Park; Y K Kim; C S Kim; H C Yu; S B Hwang
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2010-08-03       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Optimal pulse sequence for ferumoxides-enhanced MR imaging used in the detection of hepatocellular carcinoma: a comparative study using seven pulse sequences.

Authors:  Seung Hoon Kim; Dongil Choi; Jae Hoon Lim; Won Jae Lee; Hyun Jung Jang; Hyo Keun Lim; Soon Jin Lee; Jae Min Cho; Seung Kwon Kim; Gab Chul Kim
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2002 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 3.500

4.  Gadoxetic acid disodium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for the detection of hepatocellular carcinoma: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xijiao Liu; Li Zou; Fei Liu; Yin Zhou; Bin Song
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-08-15       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.