Literature DB >> 9039583

Evaluation of the temporal evolution of acute spinal cord injury.

V M Runge1, J W Wells, S A Baldwin, S W Scheff, D A Blades.   

Abstract

RATIONALE AND
OBJECTIVES: After receiving a controlled injury to the thoracic cord, five rats were examined on a 1.5-T magnetic resonance (MR) imaging system at regular intervals over 1 month to assess evolution of the injury.
METHODS: After the rats received pentobarbital anesthesia, a T10 laminectomy was performed on them, which exposed the dura over the dorsal surface of the spinal cord. With the animal placed in a New York University weight-drop device, a 10-g rod with a flat brass tip was dropped (free-fall) from a height of 50 mm to impact the cord. After injury, the incision was closed with suture material. Each animal was imaged on the day of injury, and at 7, 14, and 28 days after injury. Before contrast injection was administered, sagittal sections were obtained with T2 fast-spin echo and T1-spin echo technique. Each rat then received 0.3-mmol/kg gadoteridol (Gd HP-DO3A or ProHance) intravenously, with the T1 scan repeated. At 28 days, the animals were killed, and the cord was fixed and embedded in paraffin for histologic evaluation.
RESULTS: The intensity of cord enhancement in the region of injury, after intravenous (i.v.) contrast injection, was at a maximum on the day of injury, and it decreased in a steady fashion thereafter. The intensity was 11.7 +/- 0.6 on the day of injury, 9.7 +/- 2.6 on day 7, 6.3 +/- 5.3 on day 14, and 0.0 +/- 2.3 on day 28. The results on day 0 and 7 were statistically significant in terms of a difference from that on day 28, with a P value < 0.001. The length of cord injury, assessed postcontrast, also decreased in a steady fashion from the day of injury. The length of injury (in cm) was 1.1 +/- 0.1 on the day of injury, 0.5 +/- 0.2 on day 7, 0.3 +/- 0.1 on day 14, and 0.1 +/- 0.1 on day 28. The results on day 0 and 14 were statistically significant in terms of a difference from those at the next time point, with P values from < 0.01 to < 0.001. Visually, on T2 images, substantial edema was noted on day 0, with progression to focal cord atrophy and gliosis by day 28.
CONCLUSIONS: Acute spinal cord injury in a rat model is well visualized on pre- and postcontrast MR scans at 1.5 T. Observation of T2 changes and disruption of the blood-spinal cord barrier provide markers for temporal assessment of spinal cord injury in the rat model.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9039583     DOI: 10.1097/00004424-199702000-00006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest Radiol        ISSN: 0020-9996            Impact factor:   6.016


  8 in total

1.  In vivo longitudinal MRI and behavioral studies in experimental spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Laura M Sundberg; Juan J Herrera; Ponnada A Narayana
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2010-10-09       Impact factor: 5.269

2.  MRI and the evaluation of the blood-spinal cord barrier following injury.

Authors:  Eric D Schwartz
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 3.825

3.  Evaluation of the pathologic characteristics of excitotoxic spinal cord injury with MR imaging.

Authors:  Sara A Berens; Daniel C Colvin; Chen-Guang Yu; Robert P Yezierski; Thomas H Mareci
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 3.825

4.  Neuropathological differences between rats and mice after spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Kimberly R Byrnes; Stanley T Fricke; Alan I Faden
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 5.  Propitious Therapeutic Modulators to Prevent Blood-Spinal Cord Barrier Disruption in Spinal Cord Injury.

Authors:  Hemant Kumar; Alexander E Ropper; Soo-Hong Lee; Inbo Han
Journal:  Mol Neurobiol       Date:  2016-05-18       Impact factor: 5.590

6.  Effect of VEGF treatment on the blood-spinal cord barrier permeability in experimental spinal cord injury: dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Chirag B Patel; David M Cohen; Pallavi Ahobila-Vajjula; Laura M Sundberg; Tessy Chacko; Ponnada A Narayana
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 5.269

7.  Blood-spinal cord barrier permeability in experimental spinal cord injury: dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI.

Authors:  David M Cohen; Chirag B Patel; Pallavi Ahobila-Vajjula; Laura M Sundberg; Tessy Chacko; Shi-Jie Liu; Ponnada A Narayana
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 4.044

8.  Quantifying blood-spinal cord barrier permeability after peripheral nerve injury in the living mouse.

Authors:  Lindsay S Cahill; Christine L Laliberté; Xue Jun Liu; Jonathan Bishop; Brian J Nieman; Jeffrey S Mogil; Robert E Sorge; Catherine D Jones; Michael W Salter; R Mark Henkelman
Journal:  Mol Pain       Date:  2014-09-13       Impact factor: 3.395

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.