Literature DB >> 9039075

Prediction of cardiac structure and function by repeated clinic and ambulatory blood pressure.

R H Fagard1, J A Staessen, L Thijs.   

Abstract

We performed imaging echocardiography, Doppler velocimetry, and repeated clinic and ambulatory blood pressure measurements in 74 hypertensive individuals to clarify why reports differ on the strength of the relationships of left ventricular characteristics with clinic blood pressure, on the superiority of ambulatory over clinic pressure, and on the importance of day-time and nighttime pressures. Clinic pressure was measured five times with an automated device and five times with the conventional technique on 2 different days. The partial correlation coefficients of left ventricular mass and wall thickness with the first automated systolic and diastolic clinic pressures amounted to .38 to .45 (P < .001), improved with increasing numbers of measurements, and reached .56 to .58 for the average of 10 automated pressure determinations. Similar trends were observed for conventional clinic pressures. Average 24-hour pressures were significantly related to mass and wall thickness (partial r = .50 to .61, P < .001) and explained 3% to 6% (systolic) and 5% to 12% (diastolic) of the variance of cardiac structure in addition to the first automated or conventional clinic pressure (P < .05). However, when 10 clinic measurements were averaged, only diastolic 24-hour pressure added information over and above clinic pressure (P < .05); the additional explained variance was larger with regard to the conventional (+4% for mass and +7% for wall thickness) rather than the automated (+3% for wall thickness only) pressures. Mass and wall thickness were more closely related to day-time than nighttime pressures and were not independently related to day-night differences in pressure, except when men and women were considered separately; the results were similar when four different definitions of day and night were applied. Finally, the weak association of left ventricular diastolic function with blood pressure did not improve on repeated clinic or ambulatory blood pressure measurements. In conclusion, increasing numbers of measurements strengthen the relationships of clinic pressure with left ventricular mass and wall thickness and, conversely, diminish the additional predictive power of 24-hour blood pressure. The importance of nighttime pressure and of the nighttime pressure fall does not seem to depend on the definition of day and night but differs in men and women.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9039075     DOI: 10.1161/01.hyp.29.1.22

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hypertension        ISSN: 0194-911X            Impact factor:   10.190


  16 in total

1.  Ambulatory and self-monitoring of blood pressure: coming of age.

Authors:  Peter W de Leeuw
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 5.369

2.  Comparison of different measures of blood pressure. Use sphygmomanometers more, not less.

Authors:  William T Hamilton; Deborah Sharp
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-12-07

3.  Location not quantity of blood pressure measurements predicts mortality in hemodialysis patients.

Authors:  Rajiv Agarwal; Martin J Andersen; Robert P Light
Journal:  Am J Nephrol       Date:  2007-10-24       Impact factor: 3.754

4.  Diagnostic Performance of Blood Pressure Measurement Modalities in Living Kidney Donor Candidates.

Authors:  Sherif Armanyous; Yasushi Ohashi; Michael Lioudis; Jesse D Schold; George Thomas; Emilio D Poggio; Joshua J Augustine
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2019-04-04       Impact factor: 8.237

5.  Inter-arm blood pressure differences compared with ambulatory monitoring: a manifestation of the 'white-coat' effect?

Authors:  Una Martin; Roger Holder; James Hodgkinson; Richard McManus
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 5.386

Review 6.  Relative effectiveness of clinic and home blood pressure monitoring compared with ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in diagnosis of hypertension: systematic review.

Authors:  J Hodgkinson; J Mant; U Martin; B Guo; F D R Hobbs; J J Deeks; C Heneghan; N Roberts; R J McManus
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2011-06-24

Review 7.  Prognostic value of blood pressure variability and average blood pressure levels in patients with hypertension and diabetes.

Authors:  Gianfranco Parati; Juan Eugenio Ochoa; Paolo Salvi; Carolina Lombardi; Grzegorz Bilo
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 19.112

8.  Prevalence, predictive factor, and clinical significance of white-coat hypertension and masked hypertension in Korean hypertensive patients.

Authors:  Eui-Seock Hwang; Kee-Joon Choi; Duk-Hyun Kang; Gi-Byoung Nam; Jae-Sik Jang; Young-Hoon Jeong; Chang-Hoon Lee; Ji-Young Lee; Hyun-Koo Park; Chong-Hun Park
Journal:  Korean J Intern Med       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 2.884

9.  Masked hypertensives: A disguised arterial stiffness population.

Authors:  Christina Antza; Ioannis Doundoulakis; Stella Stabouli; Konstantinos Tziomalos; Vasilios Kotsis
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2019-09-09       Impact factor: 3.738

Review 10.  Masked hypertension definition, impact, outcomes: a critical review.

Authors:  Dimitris P Papadopoulos; Thomas K Makris
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 3.738

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.