Rajiv Agarwal1, Martin J Andersen, Robert P Light. 1. Indiana University School of Medicine and Richard L. Roudebush Veterans Administration Medical Center, Indianapolis, Ind. 46202, USA. ragarwal@iupui.edu
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Blood pressure (BP) measurements obtained outside the dialysis unit are prognostically superior. Whether it is the greater number of measurements made outside the dialysis unit that correlates with prognosis or whether BPs outside dialysis units are ecologically more valid is unknown. METHODS AND RESULTS: A prospective cohort study was conducted in 133 patients on chronic hemodialysis. BP was measured by the patients at home for 1 week, over an interdialytic interval by ambulatory recording, and by 'routine' and standardized methods in the dialysis unit for 2 weeks. Up to 6 BPs were randomly selected from a 44-hour recording of ambulatory or 1-week recording of home BPs, such that the dialysis unit BPs were exactly matched to the number of ambulatory or home BPs. The relationship with left ventricular hypertrophy and all-cause mortality was analyzed using receiver-operating characteristic curves and Cox proportional hazards analysis, respectively. Over a median follow-up of 24 months, 46 patients (31%) died. A BP change of 10/5 mm Hg increased the risk of all-cause mortality by 1.22 (95% CI 1.07-1.38)/1.18 (95% CI 1.05-1.31) with the average of the 44-hour recording and 1.20 (95% CI 1.07-1.34)/1.15 (95% CI 1.03-1.27) when up to 6 random BPs from the same ambulatory recording were drawn and averaged. With home BPs the hazard ratios were 1.17/1.15 per 10/5 mm Hg increase in BP with the average of 1-week recording and 1.18/1.13 when up to 6 random BPs were drawn and averaged. Limited duration ambulatory BP monitoring of any 6-hour interval during the first 24 h or 4-day home BP recorded after the midweek dialysis was similarly predictive of all-cause mortality. CONCLUSIONS: In patients on hemodialysis, the location, not the quantity, of the BP recordings obtained outside the dialysis unit is associated with target organ damage and mortality. 2007 S. Karger AG, Basel
BACKGROUND: Blood pressure (BP) measurements obtained outside the dialysis unit are prognostically superior. Whether it is the greater number of measurements made outside the dialysis unit that correlates with prognosis or whether BPs outside dialysis units are ecologically more valid is unknown. METHODS AND RESULTS: A prospective cohort study was conducted in 133 patients on chronic hemodialysis. BP was measured by the patients at home for 1 week, over an interdialytic interval by ambulatory recording, and by 'routine' and standardized methods in the dialysis unit for 2 weeks. Up to 6 BPs were randomly selected from a 44-hour recording of ambulatory or 1-week recording of home BPs, such that the dialysis unit BPs were exactly matched to the number of ambulatory or home BPs. The relationship with left ventricular hypertrophy and all-cause mortality was analyzed using receiver-operating characteristic curves and Cox proportional hazards analysis, respectively. Over a median follow-up of 24 months, 46 patients (31%) died. A BP change of 10/5 mm Hg increased the risk of all-cause mortality by 1.22 (95% CI 1.07-1.38)/1.18 (95% CI 1.05-1.31) with the average of the 44-hour recording and 1.20 (95% CI 1.07-1.34)/1.15 (95% CI 1.03-1.27) when up to 6 random BPs from the same ambulatory recording were drawn and averaged. With home BPs the hazard ratios were 1.17/1.15 per 10/5 mm Hg increase in BP with the average of 1-week recording and 1.18/1.13 when up to 6 random BPs were drawn and averaged. Limited duration ambulatory BP monitoring of any 6-hour interval during the first 24 h or 4-day home BP recorded after the midweek dialysis was similarly predictive of all-cause mortality. CONCLUSIONS: In patients on hemodialysis, the location, not the quantity, of the BP recordings obtained outside the dialysis unit is associated with target organ damage and mortality. 2007 S. Karger AG, Basel
Authors: Carmine Zoccali; Francesco Antonio Benedetto; Francesca Mallamaci; Giovanni Tripepi; Giuseppe Giacone; Alessandro Cataliotti; Giuseppe Seminara; Benedetta Stancanelli; Lorenzo Salvatore Malatino Journal: J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2001-12 Impact factor: 10.121
Authors: Eoin O'Brien; Roland Asmar; Lawrie Beilin; Yutaka Imai; Jean-Michel Mallion; Giuseppe Mancia; Thomas Mengden; Martin Myers; Paul Padfield; Paolo Palatini; Gianfranco Parati; Thomas Pickering; Josep Redon; Jan Staessen; George Stergiou; Paolo Verdecchia Journal: J Hypertens Date: 2003-05 Impact factor: 4.844
Authors: Denis L Clement; Marc L De Buyzere; Dirk A De Bacquer; Peter W de Leeuw; Daniel A Duprez; Robert H Fagard; Peter J Gheeraert; Luc H Missault; Jacob J Braun; Roland O Six; Patricia Van Der Niepen; Eoin O'Brien Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2003-06-12 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: L Thijs; J A Staessen; H Celis; R Fagard; P De Cort; R de Gaudemaris; I Enström; Y Imai; S Julius; J Ménard; D Mion; P Palatini; J Rosenfeld; D Shapiro; D Spence; G Stergiou Journal: Blood Press Monit Date: 1999-04 Impact factor: 1.444
Authors: Dana C Miskulin; Jennifer Gassman; Ronald Schrader; Ambreen Gul; Manisha Jhamb; David W Ploth; Lavinia Negrea; Raymond Y Kwong; Andrew S Levey; Ajay K Singh; Antonia Harford; Susan Paine; Cynthia Kendrick; Mahboob Rahman; Philip Zager Journal: J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2017-12-06 Impact factor: 10.121
Authors: Mark R Rohrscheib; Orrin B Myers; Karen S Servilla; Christopher D Adams; Dana Miskulin; Edward J Bedrick; William C Hunt; Douglas E Lindsey; Darlene Gabaldon; Philip G Zager Journal: Clin J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2008-08-13 Impact factor: 8.237
Authors: Rajiv Agarwal; Tesfamariam Metiku; Getachew G Tegegne; Robert P Light; Zerihun Bunaye; Dagim M Bekele; Ken Kelley Journal: Clin J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2008-05-21 Impact factor: 8.237