Literature DB >> 9035269

The role of gastric and postgastric sites in glucose-conditioned flavor preferences in rats.

D B Drucker1, A Sclafani.   

Abstract

Two experiments examined the role of gastric and postgastric contributions in the development of flavor preferences in rats. During training trials, food-deprived rats consumed, on alternate days, a cue flavor paired with glucose infusions and another flavor paired with water infusions. Preferences were assessed in choice tests between the two cue flavors without infusions. The first experiment compared preferences conditioned to a flavor paired with intraduodenal (ID) glucose infusions to those paired with intragastric (IG) infusions. ID glucose-conditioned preferences were as strong as that of IG glucose. The second experiment examined whether the actions of glucose in the stomach alone were sufficient to condition flavor preferences. Glucose infusions were restricted to the stomach with an inflated pyloric cuff and then removed at the end of 30-min training sessions before the cuff was deflated. Rats trained with this procedure did not develop a reliable flavor preference. Flavor preferences were obtained, however, when the cuff was inflated for 30 min after the end of the daily training sessions, or when the cuff was inflated during the training sessions but then deflated without removing the infused glucose. Both of these procedures allowed at least some of the infused glucose to empty into the intestine. Taken together, the results indicate that information from the stomach is neither necessary nor sufficient to produce glucose-conditioned flavor preferences. Such preferences are reinforced by the intestinal and/or postabsorptive actions of glucose.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9035269     DOI: 10.1016/s0031-9384(96)00414-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Physiol Behav        ISSN: 0031-9384


  16 in total

Review 1.  Gut-brain nutrient signaling. Appetition vs. satiation.

Authors:  Anthony Sclafani
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2012-06-01       Impact factor: 3.868

2.  Gut T1R3 sweet taste receptors do not mediate sucrose-conditioned flavor preferences in mice.

Authors:  Anthony Sclafani; Damien S Glass; Robert F Margolskee; John I Glendinning
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2010-10-06       Impact factor: 3.619

Review 3.  Role of gut nutrient sensing in stimulating appetite and conditioning food preferences.

Authors:  Anthony Sclafani; Karen Ackroff
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2012-03-21       Impact factor: 3.619

Review 4.  From appetite setpoint to appetition: 50years of ingestive behavior research.

Authors:  Anthony Sclafani
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2018-01-02

5.  Integration of Sweet Taste and Metabolism Determines Carbohydrate Reward.

Authors:  Maria Geraldine Veldhuizen; Richard Keith Babbs; Barkha Patel; Wambura Fobbs; Nils B Kroemer; Elizabeth Garcia; Martin R Yeomans; Dana M Small
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2017-08-10       Impact factor: 10.834

6.  Post-oral infusion sites that support glucose-conditioned flavor preferences in rats.

Authors:  Karen Ackroff; Yeh-Min Yiin; Anthony Sclafani
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2009-12-21

7.  Rapid post-oral stimulation of intake and flavor conditioning in rats by glucose but not a non-metabolizable glucose analog.

Authors:  Karen Ackroff; Anthony Sclafani
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2014-05-06

8.  Post-oral glucose stimulation of intake and conditioned flavor preference in C57BL/6J mice: a concentration-response study.

Authors:  Steven Zukerman; Karen Ackroff; Anthony Sclafani
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2012-11-28

Review 9.  Learned flavor preferences. The variable potency of post-oral nutrient reinforcers.

Authors:  Karen Ackroff
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2008-07-07       Impact factor: 3.868

10.  Post-oral appetite stimulation by sugars and nonmetabolizable sugar analogs.

Authors:  Steven Zukerman; Karen Ackroff; Anthony Sclafani
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2013-08-07       Impact factor: 3.619

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.