OBJECTIVE: To identify correlates of controlled hypertension in a largely minority population of treated hypertensive patients. DESIGN: Case-control study. SETTING: Urban, public hospital. PATIENTS: A consecutive sample of patients who were aware of their diagnosis of hypertension for at least 1 month and had previously filled an antihypertensive prescription. Control patients had a systolic blood pressure (SBP) < or = 140 mm Hg and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) < or = 90 mm Hg, and case patients had a SBP > or = 180 mm Hg or DBP > or = 110 mm Hg. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Control subjects had a mean blood pressure (BP) of 130/80 mm Hg and case subjects had a mean BP of 193/106 mm Hg. Baseline demographic characteristics between the 88 case and the 133 control subjects were not significantly different. In a logistic regression model, after adjusting for age, gender, race, education, owning a telephone, and family income, controlled hypertension was associated with having a regular source of care (odds ratio [OR] 7.93; 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.86, 16.29), having been to a doctor in the previous 6 months (OR 4.81; 1.14, 20.31), reporting that cost was not a deterrent to buying their antihypertensive medication (OR 3.63; 1.59, 8.28), and having insurance (OR 2.15; 1.02, 4.52). Being compliant with antihypertensive medication regimens was of borderline significance (OR 1.96; 0.99, 3.88). A secondary analysis found that patients with Medicaid coverage were significantly less likely than the uninsured to report cost as a barrier to purchasing antihypertensive medications and seeing a physician. CONCLUSIONS: The absence of out-of-pocket expenditures under Medicaid for medications and physician care may contribute significantly to BP control. Improved access to a regular source of care and increased sensitivity to medication costs for all patients may lead to improved BP control in an indigent, inner-city population.
OBJECTIVE: To identify correlates of controlled hypertension in a largely minority population of treated hypertensivepatients. DESIGN: Case-control study. SETTING: Urban, public hospital. PATIENTS: A consecutive sample of patients who were aware of their diagnosis of hypertension for at least 1 month and had previously filled an antihypertensive prescription. Control patients had a systolic blood pressure (SBP) < or = 140 mm Hg and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) < or = 90 mm Hg, and case patients had a SBP > or = 180 mm Hg or DBP > or = 110 mm Hg. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Control subjects had a mean blood pressure (BP) of 130/80 mm Hg and case subjects had a mean BP of 193/106 mm Hg. Baseline demographic characteristics between the 88 case and the 133 control subjects were not significantly different. In a logistic regression model, after adjusting for age, gender, race, education, owning a telephone, and family income, controlled hypertension was associated with having a regular source of care (odds ratio [OR] 7.93; 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.86, 16.29), having been to a doctor in the previous 6 months (OR 4.81; 1.14, 20.31), reporting that cost was not a deterrent to buying their antihypertensive medication (OR 3.63; 1.59, 8.28), and having insurance (OR 2.15; 1.02, 4.52). Being compliant with antihypertensive medication regimens was of borderline significance (OR 1.96; 0.99, 3.88). A secondary analysis found that patients with Medicaid coverage were significantly less likely than the uninsured to report cost as a barrier to purchasing antihypertensive medications and seeing a physician. CONCLUSIONS: The absence of out-of-pocket expenditures under Medicaid for medications and physician care may contribute significantly to BP control. Improved access to a regular source of care and increased sensitivity to medication costs for all patients may lead to improved BP control in an indigent, inner-city population.
Authors: Roland J Thorpe; Janice V Bowie; Jenny R Smolen; Caryn N Bell; Michael L Jenkins; John Jackson; Thomas A LaVeist Journal: Ethn Dis Date: 2014 Impact factor: 1.847
Authors: J D Purakal; J Williams-Johnson; E W Williams; S Pemba; J Kambona; R Welch; J Flack; P Levy Journal: West Indian Med J Date: 2014-06-11 Impact factor: 0.171
Authors: Susan A Oliveria; Roland S Chen; Bruce D McCarthy; Catherine C Davis; Martha N Hill Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2005-03 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Haslyn E R Hunte; Graciela Mentz; James S House; Amy J Schulz; David R Williams; Michael R Elliott; Jeffrey D Morenoff; Denise M White-Perkins Journal: Ethn Dis Date: 2012 Impact factor: 1.847
Authors: J M Kotchen; B Shakoor-Abdullah; W E Walker; T H Chelius; R G Hoffmann; T A Kotchen Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 1998-11 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Laurent S Tao; Peter Hart; Emma Edwards; Arthur T Evans; Eric Whitaker; Pamela Smith Journal: J Natl Med Assoc Date: 2003-04 Impact factor: 1.798