Literature DB >> 9032512

Patient-ventilator interaction and inspiratory effort during pressure support ventilation in patients with different pathologies.

S Nava1, C Bruschi, C Fracchia, A Braschi, F Rubini.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate whether pressure support ventilation (PSV) requires different diaphragmatic efforts and patient-ventilator matching, according to the underlying disease. Four groups of patients requiring PSV were studied: Group A, recovering from an episode of acute respiratory failure due to adult respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS); Group B, with postsurgical complications; and two subsets of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients, with "normal" static compliance of the respiratory system (Cst,rs) (Group C) or elevated Cst,rs (Group D). Ventilatory pattern, transdiaphragmatic pressure (Pdi), the pressure-time product of the diaphragm (PTPdi), static (PEEPi,stat) and dynamic intrinsic positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEPi,dyn), Cst,rs and resistance of the total respiratory system (Rrs) were recorded. The matching between patient and ventilator was analysed, recording the number of "ineffective efforts" (inspiratory efforts not efficient enough to trigger a new ventilator cycle, despite a positive deflection in Pdi). A satisfactory blood gas equilibrium arterial oxygen saturation (Sa,O2 > 93%, with a pH > 7.32) was obtained in the various groups with different levels of PSV. Minute ventilation was found to be significantly higher in Groups A and B, due to the longer expiratory time (tE) in the COPD groups. Group A (2 out of 7), Group B (3 out of 7), Group C (3 out of 5) patients showed sporadic "ineffective efforts". All Group D patients manifested continuous mismatching with the ventilator, so that the pressure-time product of the diaphragm per minute (PTPdi/min), reflecting the metabolic work of the diaphragm, was not different in the four groups. Tidal volume and the spontaneous inspiratory efforts were similar in the four groups, but the number of breaths delivered by the ventilator was significantly higher in Groups A and B. The application of different levels of pressure support ventilation in patients with acute respiratory failure due to different pathologies, led them to breathe with comparable pressure time product of the diaphragm. The majority of the patients showed mismatching with the ventilator, although this effect was more pronounced in the groups with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9032512     DOI: 10.1183/09031936.97.10010177

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Respir J        ISSN: 0903-1936            Impact factor:   16.671


  33 in total

1.  Ineffective efforts during mechanical ventilation: the brain wants, the machine declines.

Authors:  Dimitris Georgopoulos
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 17.440

2.  Noninvasive ventilation through a helmet in postextubation hypoxemic patients: physiologic comparison between neurally adjusted ventilatory assist and pressure support ventilation.

Authors:  Gianmaria Cammarota; Carlo Olivieri; Roberta Costa; Rosanna Vaschetto; Davide Colombo; Emilia Turucz; Federico Longhini; Francesco Della Corte; Giorgio Conti; Paolo Navalesi
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2011-10-18       Impact factor: 17.440

3.  Neurally adjusted ventilatory assist improves patient-ventilator interaction.

Authors:  Lise Piquilloud; Laurence Vignaux; Emilie Bialais; Jean Roeseler; Thierry Sottiaux; Pierre-François Laterre; Philippe Jolliet; Didier Tassaux
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2010-09-25       Impact factor: 17.440

4.  A bench evaluation of fraction of oxygen in air delivery and tidal volume accuracy in home care ventilators available for hospital use.

Authors:  Loredana Baboi; Fabien Subtil; Claude Guérin
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 5.  Assessing breathing effort in mechanical ventilation: physiology and clinical implications.

Authors:  Heder de Vries; Annemijn Jonkman; Zhong-Hua Shi; Angélique Spoelstra-de Man; Leo Heunks
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2018-10

6.  Patient-ventilator asynchrony during assisted mechanical ventilation.

Authors:  Arnaud W Thille; Pablo Rodriguez; Belen Cabello; François Lellouche; Laurent Brochard
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2006-08-01       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 7.  [Current concepts of augmented spontaneous breathing: new modes of effort-adapted weaning].

Authors:  T Bein
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 1.041

8.  Patient-ventilator asynchrony during non-invasive ventilation for acute respiratory failure: a multicenter study.

Authors:  Laurence Vignaux; Frédéric Vargas; Jean Roeseler; Didier Tassaux; Arnaud W Thille; Michel P Kossowsky; Laurent Brochard; Philippe Jolliet
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2009-01-29       Impact factor: 17.440

9.  Observational study of patient-ventilator asynchrony and relationship to sedation level.

Authors:  Marjolein de Wit; Sammy Pedram; Al M Best; Scott K Epstein
Journal:  J Crit Care       Date:  2009-01-17       Impact factor: 3.425

10.  Neurally adjusted ventilatory assist (NAVA) improves patient-ventilator interaction during non-invasive ventilation delivered by face mask.

Authors:  Lise Piquilloud; Didier Tassaux; Emilie Bialais; Bernard Lambermont; Thierry Sottiaux; Jean Roeseler; Pierre-François Laterre; Philippe Jolliet; Jean-Pierre Revelly
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2012-08-03       Impact factor: 17.440

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.