Literature DB >> 9029508

Energetic and entropic factors determining binding affinity in protein-ligand complexes.

G Klebe1, H J Böhm.   

Abstract

Understanding of non-covalent interactions in protein-ligand complexes is essential in modern biochemistry and should contribute toward the discovery of new drugs. The affinity of a ligand toward its receptor falls into a range of 10-80 kJ/mol. It is related to the binding constant and corresponds to a free energy. Accordingly enthalpic and entropic effects determine binding affinity. Hydrogen bonds and lipophilic contacts are the most important contributions to protein-ligand interactions. They are governed by changes in entropy and enthalpy. Solvation and desolvation effects either of the ligand and the protein binding site play a key role in the binding process. Prerequisite for a quantitative description and subsequently for a prediction of protein-ligand interactions is a partitioning in additive group contributions. In many cases, this additivity seems to be a good approximation, however, phenomena such as conformational pre-organizations give rise for a non-additive behavior. Flexibility and mobility of the bound ligand influence binding affinity. The rare experiments separating enthalpic and entropic contributions to the binding affinity sometimes reveal surprisings results, e.g. the loss of a hydrogen bond parallels with a loss in entropy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9029508     DOI: 10.3109/10799899709036621

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Recept Signal Transduct Res        ISSN: 1079-9893            Impact factor:   2.092


  13 in total

1.  Receptor-based 3D QSAR analysis of estrogen receptor ligands--merging the accuracy of receptor-based alignments with the computational efficiency of ligand-based methods.

Authors:  W Sippl
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 3.686

2.  Modified AutoDock for accurate docking of protein kinase inhibitors.

Authors:  Oleksandr V Buzko; Anthony C Bishop; Kevan M Shokat
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 3.686

3.  Targeting imidazoline site on monoamine oxidase B through molecular docking simulations.

Authors:  Fernanda Pretto Moraes; Walter Filgueira de Azevedo
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2012-03-17       Impact factor: 1.810

4.  Tuning of hydrogen bond strength using substituents on phenol and aniline: a possible ligand design strategy.

Authors:  Jóhannes Reynisson; Edward McDonald
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 3.686

5.  Chemical Diversity of Metabolites from Fungi, Cyanobacteria, and Plants Relative to FDA-Approved Anticancer Agents.

Authors:  Tamam El-Elimat; Xiaoli Zhang; David Jarjoura; Franklin J Moy; Jimmy Orjala; A Douglas Kinghorn; Cedric J Pearce; Nicholas H Oberlies
Journal:  ACS Med Chem Lett       Date:  2012-07-12       Impact factor: 4.345

6.  Isoform-specific inhibition of cyclophilins.

Authors:  Sebastian Daum; Michael Schumann; Sebastian Mathea; Tobias Aumüller; Molly A Balsley; Stephanie L Constant; Boris Féaux de Lacroix; Fabian Kruska; Manfred Braun; Cordelia Schiene-Fischer
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2009-07-07       Impact factor: 3.162

7.  TAE226, a Bis-Anilino Pyrimidine Compound, Inhibits the EGFR-Mutant Kinase Including T790M Mutant to Show Anti-Tumor Effect on EGFR-Mutant Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Cells.

Authors:  Hiroki Otani; Hiromasa Yamamoto; Munenori Takaoka; Masakiyo Sakaguchi; Junichi Soh; Masaru Jida; Tsuyoshi Ueno; Takafumi Kubo; Hiroaki Asano; Kazunori Tsukuda; Katsuyuki Kiura; Shinji Hatakeyama; Eiji Kawahara; Yoshio Naomoto; Shinichiro Miyoshi; Shinichi Toyooka
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-19       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  eMatchSite: sequence order-independent structure alignments of ligand binding pockets in protein models.

Authors:  Michal Brylinski
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2014-09-18       Impact factor: 4.475

9.  A structural analysis of DNA binding by hSSB1 (NABP2/OBFC2B) in solution.

Authors:  Christine Touma; Ruvini Kariawasam; Adrian X Gimenez; Ray E Bernardo; Nicholas W Ashton; Mark N Adams; Nicolas Paquet; Tristan I Croll; Kenneth J O'Byrne; Derek J Richard; Liza Cubeddu; Roland Gamsjaeger
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2016-07-07       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  The structural basis of the genetic code: amino acid recognition by aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases.

Authors:  Florian Kaiser; Sarah Krautwurst; Sebastian Salentin; V Joachim Haupt; Christoph Leberecht; Sebastian Bittrich; Dirk Labudde; Michael Schroeder
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-07-28       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.