Literature DB >> 9029429

A descriptive study of recurrent low back pain claims.

M J MacDonald1, G S Sorock, E Volinn, L Hashemi, E A Clancy, B Webster.   

Abstract

This is the first large-scale study of US workers that describes the demographic and cost differences between recurrent and nonrecurrent low back pain (LBP) disability claimants, using data from a large workers' compensation insurer. Persons with at least one LBP claim in 1990 and one or more additional claims in 1990 to 1996 were defined as recurrent. Persons with at least one LBP claim in 1990 but no subsequent claims were defined as nonrecurrent. Fourteen percent of claimants were recurrent. The percentage of recurrent claimants who were male (77.2%) was higher than the percentage that were female (22.8%). This difference was more pronounced in the younger age groups. The median total cost for recurrent LBP claims in 1990 was 4% greater than for nonrecurrent 1990 LBP claims, whereas the mean cost was 48% less. Most studies of LBP recurrence among US workers have followed single-corporation employees. Our rate of recurrence was lower than these previously reported rates. However, analysis of independent workers' compensation insurance company data may provide a more accurate assessment of LBP claim recurrence among US workers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9029429     DOI: 10.1097/00043764-199701000-00008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Occup Environ Med        ISSN: 1076-2752            Impact factor:   2.162


  12 in total

Review 1.  Methodological challenges in studying recurrence of low back pain.

Authors:  Radoslaw Wasiak; Glenn S Pransky; Barbara S Webster
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2003-03

2.  Differences among outcome measures in occupational low back pain.

Authors:  Sue A Ferguson; William S Marras; Deborah L Burr
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2005-09

Review 3.  Measuring return to work.

Authors:  Radoslaw Wasiak; Amanda E Young; Richard T Roessler; Kathryn M McPherson; Mireille N M van Poppel; Johannes R Anema
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2007-10-11

4.  Females exhibit shorter paraspinal reflex latencies than males in response to sudden trunk flexion perturbations.

Authors:  Emily M Miller; Gregory P Slota; Michael J Agnew; Michael L Madigan
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2010-03-31       Impact factor: 2.063

5.  Do zero-cost workers' compensation medical claims really have zero costs? The impact of workplace injury on group health insurance utilization and costs.

Authors:  Abay Asfaw; Roger Rosa; Rebecca Mao
Journal:  J Occup Environ Med       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 2.162

6.  Patients with chronic non-specific low back pain who reported reduction in pain and improvement in function also demonstrated an improvement in gait pattern.

Authors:  Yair Barzilay; Ganit Segal; Raphael Lotan; Gilad Regev; Yiftah Beer; Baron S Lonner; Amit Mor; Avi Elbaz
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-05-16       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Characteristics of agricultural and occupational injuries by workers' compensation and other payer sources.

Authors:  Celestin Missikpode; Corinne Peek-Asa; Brad Wright; Marizen Ramirez
Journal:  Am J Ind Med       Date:  2019-08-22       Impact factor: 2.214

8.  Spine kinematics predict symptom and lost time recurrence: how much recovery is enough?

Authors:  Sue A Ferguson; William S Marras
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2013-09

9.  Estimating investment worthiness of an ergonomic intervention for preventing low back pain from a firm's perspective.

Authors:  Richard E Hughes; Nancy A Nelson
Journal:  Appl Ergon       Date:  2008-11-22       Impact factor: 3.661

10.  Low back pain education and short term quality of life: a randomized trial.

Authors:  Sedigheh Sadat Tavafian; Ahmadreza Jamshidi; Kazem Mohammad; Ali Montazeri
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2007-02-28       Impact factor: 2.362

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.