Literature DB >> 20359800

Females exhibit shorter paraspinal reflex latencies than males in response to sudden trunk flexion perturbations.

Emily M Miller1, Gregory P Slota, Michael J Agnew, Michael L Madigan.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Females have a higher risk of experiencing low back pain or injury than males. One possible reason for this might be altered reflexes since longer paraspinal reflex latencies exist in injured patients versus healthy controls. Gender differences have been reported in paraspinal reflex latency, yet findings are inconsistent. The goal here was to investigate gender differences in paraspinal reflex latency, avoiding and accounting for potentially gender-confounding experimental factors.
METHODS: Ten males and ten females underwent repeated trunk flexion perturbations. Paraspinal muscle activity and trunk kinematics were recorded to calculate reflex latency and maximum trunk flexion velocity. Two-way mixed model analyses of variance were used to determine the effects of gender on reflex latency and maximum trunk flexion velocity.
FINDINGS: Reflex latency was 18.7% shorter in females than in males (P=0.02) when exposed to identical trunk perturbations, and did not vary by impulse (P=0.38). However, maximum trunk flexion velocity was 35.3% faster in females than males (P=0.01) when exposed to identical trunk perturbations, and increased with impulse (P<0.01). While controlling for differences in maximum trunk flexion velocity, reflex latency was 16.4% shorter in females than males (P=0.04).
INTERPRETATION: The higher prevalence of low back pain and injury among females does not appear to result from slower paraspinal reflexes. Copyright (c) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20359800      PMCID: PMC2878900          DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2010.02.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)        ISSN: 0268-0033            Impact factor:   2.063


  27 in total

1.  Rapid neck muscle adaptation alters the head kinematics of aware and unaware subjects undergoing multiple whiplash-like perturbations.

Authors:  Gunter P Siegmund; David J Sanderson; Barry S Myers; J Timothy Inglis
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 2.712

2.  Active trunk stiffness during voluntary isometric flexion and extension exertions.

Authors:  Patrick J Lee; Kevin P Granata; Kevin M Moorhouse
Journal:  Hum Factors       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 2.888

3.  Muscular response to sudden load. A tool to evaluate fatigue and rehabilitation.

Authors:  D G Wilder; A R Aleksiev; M L Magnusson; M H Pope; K F Spratt; V K Goel
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1996-11-15       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Identification of intrinsic and reflex contributions to human ankle stiffness dynamics.

Authors:  R E Kearney; R B Stein; L Parameswaran
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 4.538

5.  Trunk stiffness and dynamics during active extension exertions.

Authors:  Kevin M Moorhouse; Kevin P Granata
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 2.712

6.  System identification of human triceps surae stretch reflex dynamics.

Authors:  R E Kearney; I W Hunter
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 7.  The human stretch reflex and the motor cortex.

Authors:  P B Matthews
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 13.837

8.  Muscle response pattern to sudden trunk loading in healthy individuals and in patients with chronic low back pain.

Authors:  A Radebold; J Cholewicki; M M Panjabi; T C Patel
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2000-04-15       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Neuromuscular Response Characteristics in Men and Women After Knee Perturbation in a Single-Leg, Weight-Bearing Stance.

Authors:  Sandra J. Shultz; David H. Perrin; Milton J. Adams; Brent L. Arnold; Bruce M. Gansneder; Kevin P. Granata
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 2.860

10.  A case-control study of risk factors for industrial low back injury: implications for primary and secondary prevention programs.

Authors:  L H Daltroy; M G Larson; E A Wright; S Malspeis; A H Fossel; J Ryan; C Zwerling; M H Liang
Journal:  Am J Ind Med       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 2.214

View more
  1 in total

1.  Effects of exercise-induced low back pain on intrinsic trunk stiffness and paraspinal muscle reflexes.

Authors:  Emily M Miller; Babak Bazrgari; Maury A Nussbaum; Michael L Madigan
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2012-11-23       Impact factor: 2.712

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.