Literature DB >> 9028569

Assessing research productivity in an oncology research institute: the role of the documentation center.

D Ugolini1, A Bogliolo, S Parodi, C Casilli, L Santi.   

Abstract

An evaluation method used to assess the quality of research productivity and to provide priorities for budget allocation purposes is presented. This method, developed by a working group of the National Institute for Research on Cancer (IST), Genoa, Italy, is based on the partitioning of categories of the Science Citation Index and Journal Citation Reports (SCI-JCR) into deciles, which normalizes journal impact factors in order to gauge the quality of the productivity. A second parameter related to the number of staff of each institute department co-authoring a given paper has been introduced in order to guide departmental budget allocations. The information scientists of the IST Documentation Center who participated in the working group played a pivotal role in developing the computerized database of publications, providing and analyzing data, supplying and evaluating literature on the topic, and placing international bibliographic databases at the working group's disposal.

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9028569      PMCID: PMC226220     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bull Med Libr Assoc        ISSN: 0025-7338


  7 in total

1.  Research productivity and funding.

Authors:  M C Nahata
Journal:  DICP       Date:  1991-06

2.  Citation frequency and journal impact: valid indicators of scientific quality?

Authors:  P O Seglen
Journal:  J Intern Med       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 8.989

3.  Assessing research productivity: evaluating journal publication across academic departments.

Authors:  L B Ellwein; M Khachab; R H Waldman
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 6.893

4.  Scientific publications of a medical school faculty.

Authors:  R B Krumland; E E Will; G A Gorry
Journal:  J Med Educ       Date:  1979-11

5.  Government policies and the cost of doing research.

Authors:  D Kennedy
Journal:  Science       Date:  1985-02-01       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Research productivity: a definition.

Authors:  E J Zamarripa
Journal:  Ment Retard       Date:  1993-10

7.  Analysis of publication output of internal medicine faculty members.

Authors:  P Manu; S A Landaw; W J Williams; S E Schwartz
Journal:  J Med Educ       Date:  1985-11
  7 in total
  3 in total

Review 1.  How has healthcare research performance been assessed?: a systematic review.

Authors:  Vanash M Patel; Hutan Ashrafian; Kamran Ahmed; Sonal Arora; Sejal Jiwan; Jeremy K Nicholson; Ara Darzi; Thanos Athanasiou
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 5.344

2.  Discussing some basic critique on Journal Impact Factors: revision of earlier comments.

Authors:  Thed van Leeuwen
Journal:  Scientometrics       Date:  2012-02-29       Impact factor: 3.238

Review 3.  Evaluating cancer research impact: lessons and examples from existing reviews on approaches to research impact assessment.

Authors:  Catherine R Hanna; Kathleen A Boyd; Robert J Jones
Journal:  Health Res Policy Syst       Date:  2021-03-11
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.