Literature DB >> 9024479

Nurses' and resident physicians' perceptions of the process of collaboration in an MICU.

J G Baggs1, M H Schmitt.   

Abstract

Ten intensive care unit nurses and 10 medical resident physicians were interviewed to compare their perceptions of the process of nurse-physician collaboration. The grounded theory method for concept development recommended by Strauss and Corbin (1990) was used. The core of the process of collaboration for both groups was working together. Two major antecedent conditions were found: being available, which included being in the right place, having time, and having appropriate knowledge; and being receptive, which included being interested in collaboration and having respect and trust for the other profession. The major outcomes of working together were described as improving patient care, feeling better in the job, and controlling costs. The findings of the study pull together disparate concepts associated with collaborative practice and provide direction for future research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9024479     DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1098-240x(199702)20:1<71::aid-nur8>3.0.co;2-r

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Res Nurs Health        ISSN: 0160-6891            Impact factor:   2.228


  28 in total

1.  Transcending the silos: toward an interdisciplinary approach to end-of-life care in the ICU.

Authors:  J Randall Curtis; Sarah E Shannon
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2005-11-16       Impact factor: 17.440

2.  Model development for EHR interdisciplinary information exchange of ICU common goals.

Authors:  Sarah A Collins; Suzanne Bakken; David K Vawdrey; Enrico Coiera; Leanne Currie
Journal:  Int J Med Inform       Date:  2010-10-25       Impact factor: 4.046

3.  "What is found there": qualitative analysis of physician-nurse collaboration stories.

Authors:  Kathleen A McGrail; Diane S Morse; Theresa Glessner; Kathryn Gardner
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2008-12-17       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  Information needs, Infobutton Manager use, and satisfaction by clinician type: a case study.

Authors:  Sarah A Collins; Leanne M Currie; Suzanne Bakken; James J Cimino
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2008-10-24       Impact factor: 4.497

5.  Clinician preferences for verbal communication compared to EHR documentation in the ICU.

Authors:  S A Collins; S Bakken; D K Vawdrey; E Coiera; L Currie
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2011-06-08       Impact factor: 2.342

6.  Has Interprofessional Education Changed Learning Preferences? A National Perspective.

Authors:  T Michael Kashner; Debbie L Hettler; Robert A Zeiss; David C Aron; David S Bernett; Judy L Brannen; John M Byrne; Grant W Cannon; Barbara K Chang; Mary B Dougherty; Stuart C Gilman; Gloria J Holland; Catherine P Kaminetzky; Annie B Wicker; Sheri A Keitz
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2016-03-18       Impact factor: 3.402

7.  Exploring successful community pharmacist-physician collaborative working relationships using mixed methods.

Authors:  Margie E Snyder; Alan J Zillich; Brian A Primack; Kristen R Rice; Melissa A Somma McGivney; Janice L Pringle; Randall B Smith
Journal:  Res Social Adm Pharm       Date:  2010-02-11

Review 8.  Content overlap in nurse and physician handoff artifacts and the potential role of electronic health records: a systematic review.

Authors:  Sarah A Collins; Daniel M Stein; David K Vawdrey; Peter D Stetson; Suzanne Bakken
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2011-02-02       Impact factor: 6.317

9.  Facilitators of an interprofessional approach to care in medical and mixed medical/surgical ICUs: a multicenter qualitative study.

Authors:  Deena Kelly Costa; Frances K Barg; David A Asch; Jeremy M Kahn
Journal:  Res Nurs Health       Date:  2014-07-03       Impact factor: 2.228

10.  Clinicians' perceptions of the usefulness of a communication facilitator in the intensive care unit.

Authors:  Abigail A Howell; Elizabeth L Nielsen; Anne M Turner; J Randall Curtis; Ruth A Engelberg
Journal:  Am J Crit Care       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 2.228

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.