Literature DB >> 23616870

Clinician preferences for verbal communication compared to EHR documentation in the ICU.

S A Collins1, S Bakken, D K Vawdrey, E Coiera, L Currie.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Effective communication is essential to safe and efficient patient care. Additionally, many health information technology (HIT) developments, innovations, and standards aim to implement processes to improve data quality and integrity of electronic health records (EHR) for the purpose of clinical information exchange and communication.
OBJECTIVE: We aimed to understand the current patterns and perceptions of communication of common goals in the ICU using the distributed cognition and clinical communication space theoretical frameworks.
METHODS: We conducted a focus group and 5 interviews with ICU clinicians and observed 59.5 hours of interdisciplinary ICU morning rounds.
RESULTS: Clinicians used an EHR system, which included electronic documentation and computerized provider order entry (CPOE), and paper artifacts for documentation; yet, preferred the verbal communication space as a method of information exchange because they perceived that the documentation was often not updated or efficient for information retrieval. These perceptions that the EHR is a "shift behind" may lead to a further reliance on verbal information exchange, which is a valuable clinical communication activity, yet, is subject to information loss.
CONCLUSIONS: Electronic documentation tools that, in real time, capture information that is currently verbally communicated may increase the effectiveness of communication.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ICU; communication; electronic health record; interdisciplinary

Year:  2011        PMID: 23616870      PMCID: PMC3631921          DOI: 10.4338/ACI-2011-02-RA-0011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Clin Inform        ISSN: 1869-0327            Impact factor:   2.342


  19 in total

1.  Error, stress, and teamwork in medicine and aviation: cross sectional surveys.

Authors:  J B Sexton; E J Thomas; R L Helmreich
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-03-18

2.  When conversation is better than computation.

Authors:  E Coiera
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2000 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 3.  Can technology improve intershift report? What the research reveals.

Authors:  Bernadette Strople; Patricia Ottani
Journal:  J Prof Nurs       Date:  2006 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.104

4.  Model development for EHR interdisciplinary information exchange of ICU common goals.

Authors:  Sarah A Collins; Suzanne Bakken; David K Vawdrey; Enrico Coiera; Leanne Currie
Journal:  Int J Med Inform       Date:  2010-10-25       Impact factor: 4.046

Review 5.  Translational cognition for decision support in critical care environments: a review.

Authors:  Vimla L Patel; Jiajie Zhang; Nicole A Yoskowitz; Robert Green; Osman R Sayan
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2008-02-12       Impact factor: 6.317

6.  Information needs, Infobutton Manager use, and satisfaction by clinician type: a case study.

Authors:  Sarah A Collins; Leanne M Currie; Suzanne Bakken; James J Cimino
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2008-10-24       Impact factor: 4.497

7.  The first step toward data reuse: disambiguating concept representation of the locally developed ICU nursing flowsheets.

Authors:  Hyeoneui Kim; Marcelline R Harris; Guergana K Savova; Christopher G Chute
Journal:  Comput Inform Nurs       Date:  2008 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.985

8.  Nurses' and resident physicians' perceptions of the process of collaboration in an MICU.

Authors:  J G Baggs; M H Schmitt
Journal:  Res Nurs Health       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 2.228

9.  A randomized, controlled trial evaluating the impact of a computerized rounding and sign-out system on continuity of care and resident work hours.

Authors:  Erik G Van Eaton; Karen D Horvath; William B Lober; Anthony J Rossini; Carlos A Pellegrini
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 6.113

Review 10.  Fever control in the neuro-ICU: why, who, and when?

Authors:  Neeraj Badjatia
Journal:  Curr Opin Crit Care       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 3.687

View more
  7 in total

1.  Meta-generalis: A novel method for structuring information from radiology reports.

Authors:  Flavio Barbosa; Agma Jucci Traina; Valdair Francisco Muglia
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2016-08-24       Impact factor: 2.342

Review 2.  A Research Agenda for Diagnostic Excellence in Critical Care Medicine.

Authors:  Christina L Cifra; Jason W Custer; James C Fackler
Journal:  Crit Care Clin       Date:  2022-01       Impact factor: 3.598

3.  Professional and interprofessional differences in electronic health records use and recognition of safety issues in critically ill patients.

Authors:  Knewton K Sakata; Laurel S Stephenson; Ashley Mulanax; Jesse Bierman; Karess Mcgrath; Gretchen Scholl; Adrienne McDougal; David T Bearden; Vishnu Mohan; Jeffrey A Gold
Journal:  J Interprof Care       Date:  2016-06-24       Impact factor: 2.338

4.  Characterization of a handoff documentation tool through usage log data.

Authors:  Silis Y Jiang; Alexandrea Murphy; David Vawdrey; R Stanley Hum; Lena Mamykina
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2014-11-14

5.  Standardisation, multi-measure, data quality and trending: A qualitative study on multidisciplinary perspectives to improve intensive care early mobility monitoring.

Authors:  Sarina A Fazio; Amy L Doroy; Nicholas R Anderson; Jason Y Adams; Heather M Young
Journal:  Intensive Crit Care Nurs       Date:  2020-11-14       Impact factor: 3.072

6.  Information Needs and the Use of Documentation to Support Collaborative Decision-Making: Implications for the Reduction of Central Line-Associated Blood Stream Infections.

Authors:  Jennifer A Thate; Brittany Couture; Kumiko O Schnock; Sarah Collins Rossetti
Journal:  Comput Inform Nurs       Date:  2020-11-02       Impact factor: 2.146

7.  The influence of electronic health record use on collaboration among medical specialties.

Authors:  Janita F J Vos; Albert Boonstra; Arjen Kooistra; Marc Seelen; Marjolein van Offenbeek
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2020-07-22       Impact factor: 2.655

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.