Literature DB >> 9020722

Geometric evaluation of mandibular distraction.

H W Losken1, G T Patterson, D Tate, D W Coit.   

Abstract

In planning mandibular distraction, the deficiency of the vertical ramus and body is measured. The position of the pin placement is evaluated by the following formula: [formula: see text] This is more accurately presented by the new formula. [formula: see text] In one patient the original formula evaluated the pin placement angle to be 9.94, compared with 9.92, in the more accurate but more complex new formula. When the gonial angle is obtuse, the difference is small. When the gonial angle is more acute, as in a normal gonial angle for a 2-year-old child--134 degrees--the difference is still only 0.1 degree. The original formula is simpler to use and is accurate enough for clinical use in mandibular distraction. The distraction distance is not the sum of the vertical ramal deficiency plus the body deficiency but is given by the following formula: [formula: see text] It would be accurate enough to plan the total distraction distance to be less than the sum of the two distances. The more acute the gonial angle is, the less the distraction distance will need to be.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 9020722     DOI: 10.1097/00001665-199509000-00015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Craniofac Surg        ISSN: 1049-2275            Impact factor:   1.046


  1 in total

1.  [Evaluation of potential damage to the regenerate during callus molding after mandibular distraction osteogenesis. Experimental study using an animal model].

Authors:  C Kunz; N Adolphs; P Buescher; B Hammer; B Rahn
Journal:  Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir       Date:  2005-05
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.