Literature DB >> 9020417

Sedation in allergic rhinitis is caused by the condition and not by antihistamine treatment.

J Spaeth1, L Klimek, R Mösges.   

Abstract

Sedation is regarded as a common side-effect of most H1-antihistamines. This view must be accepted, yet can hardly be assessed under treatment of allergic disorders. Since central sedative potency is hard to evaluate, different methods of measurement have been introduced in the four phases of clinical investigation. While tests of high complexity in early trials can detect true central effects, they seem to have the disadvantage of not taking into consideration the important interactions of drugs with the disorder. Therefore, we used a visual analog scale (VAS) as an instrument to demonstrate sedative effects in five clinical studies carried out between 1989 and 1994 with a total number of 1070 patients. Thereby, we could assess the result of the different components of the central interaction. In 1989, in a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, we could show that the vigilance of patients suffering from seasonal allergic rhinitis increased significantly more under treatment with an antihistamine (mizolastine) than under placebo. From 1992 until 1994, we compared azelastine nasal spray either by the double-dummy technique with oral antihistamines (cetirizine, loratadine, and astemizole) or by the double-dummy or placebo-controlled design with monotherapy or combined therapy with azelastine tablets. A marked or statistically significant improvement of vigilance was found for all compounds (loratadine: P < 0.0001; cetirizine: P < 0.0254; and azelastine nasal spray: P < 0.1409 to P < 0.0001). Even when taking azelastine as oral application, patients, in spite of the warning, reported a similar increase in vigilance (P < 0.2628 to P < 0.0001). Finally, we assessed the range of physiologic vigilance using the same VAS in healthy volunteers. In conclusion, we could prove that in all trials the baseline values of vigilance of untreated symptomatic patients were far below physiologic condition and improved under treatment to the upper range of healthy persons. Therefore, any sedative properties of modern H1-antihistamines should not limit their therapeutic use, since the truly threatening sedation results from the disorder itself.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 9020417     DOI: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.1996.tb04490.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Allergy        ISSN: 0105-4538            Impact factor:   13.146


  16 in total

Review 1.  New insights into the second generation antihistamines.

Authors:  G M Walsh; L Annunziato; N Frossard; K Knol; S Levander; J M Nicolas; M Taglialatela; M D Tharp; J P Tillement; H Timmerman
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 9.546

2.  Driving ability after acute and sub-chronic administration of levocetirizine and diphenhydramine: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

Authors:  Joris C Verster; A Marit de Weert; Saskia I R Bijtjes; Mounir Aarab; Armand W A A van Oosterwijck; Erik J E Eijken; Marinus N Verbaten; Edmund R Volkerts
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2003-04-30       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 3.  Safety and tolerability profiles of intranasal antihistamines and intranasal corticosteroids in the treatment of allergic rhinitis.

Authors:  Rami Jean Salib; Peter Hugo Howarth
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 5.606

4.  Brain histamine H receptor occupancy of orally administered antihistamines measured by positron emission tomography with (11)C-doxepin in a placebo-controlled crossover study design in healthy subjects: a comparison of olopatadine and ketotifen.

Authors:  Manabu Tashiro; Hideki Mochizuki; Yumiko Sakurada; Kenji Ishii; Keiichi Oda; Yuichi Kimura; Toru Sasaki; Kiichi Ishiwata; Kazuhiko Yanai
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 4.335

5.  Second-generation antihistamines: a comparative review.

Authors:  J W Slater; A D Zechnich; D G Haxby
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 6.  Second-generation antihistamines: actions and efficacy in the management of allergic disorders.

Authors:  Larry K Golightly; Leon S Greos
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 9.546

7.  Cetirizine: a review of its use in allergic disorders.

Authors:  Monique P Curran; Lesley J Scott; Caroline M Perry
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 9.546

8.  Lack of effect of single and repeated doses of levocetirizine, a new antihistamine drug, on cognitive and psychomotor functions in healthy volunteers.

Authors:  J M Gandon; H Allain
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 4.335

9.  Perceived stress predicts allergy flares.

Authors:  Amber M Patterson; Vedat O Yildiz; Maryanna D Klatt; William B Malarkey
Journal:  Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol       Date:  2013-08-06       Impact factor: 6.347

10.  Effectiveness of twice daily azelastine nasal spray in patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis.

Authors:  Friedrich Horak
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 2.423

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.