Literature DB >> 12959630

Safety and tolerability profiles of intranasal antihistamines and intranasal corticosteroids in the treatment of allergic rhinitis.

Rami Jean Salib1, Peter Hugo Howarth.   

Abstract

Intranasal corticosteroids and intranasal antihistamines are efficacious topical therapies in the treatment of allergic rhinitis. This review addresses their relative roles in the management of this disease, focusing on their safety and tolerability profiles. The intranasal route of administration delivers drug directly to the target organ, thereby minimising the potential for the systemic adverse effects that may be evident with oral therapy. Furthermore, the topical route of delivery enables the use of lower doses of medication. Such therapies, predominantly available as aqueous formulations following the ban of chlorofluorocarbon propellants, have minimal local adverse effects. Intranasal application of therapy can induce sneezing in the hyper-reactive nose, and transient local irritation has been described with certain formulations. Intranasal administration of corticosteroids is associated with minor nose bleeding in a small proportion of recipients. This effect has been attributed to the vasoconstrictor activity of the corticosteroid molecules, and is considered to account for the very rare occurrence of nasal septal perforation. Nasal biopsy studies do not show any detrimental structural effects within the nasal mucosa with long-term administration of intranasal corticosteroids. Much attention has focused on the systemic safety of intranasal application. When administered at standard recommended therapeutic dosage, the intranasal antihistamines do not cause significant sedation or impairment of psychomotor function, effects that would be evident when these agents are administered orally at a therapeutically relevant dosage. The systemic bioavailability of intranasal corticosteroids varies from <1% to up to 40-50% and influences the risk of systemic adverse effects. Because the dose delivered topically is small, this is not a major consideration, and extensive studies have not identified significant effects on the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis with continued treatment. A small effect on growth has been reported in one study in children receiving a standard dosage over 1 year, however. This has not been found in prospective studies with the intranasal corticosteroids that have low systemic bioavailability and therefore the judicious choice of intranasal formulation, particularly if there is concurrent corticosteroid inhalation for asthma, is prudent. There is no evidence that such considerations are relevant to shorter-term use, such as in intermittent or seasonal disease. Intranasal therapy, which represents a major mode of drug delivery in allergic rhinitis, thus has a very favourable benefit/risk ratio and is the preferred route of administration for corticosteroids in the treatment of this disease, as well as an important option for antihistaminic therapy, particularly if rapid symptom relief is required.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12959630     DOI: 10.2165/00002018-200326120-00003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Drug Saf        ISSN: 0114-5916            Impact factor:   5.606


  211 in total

Review 1.  A comparison of the clinical efficacy and safety of intranasal fluticasone propionate and antihistamines in the treatment of rhinitis.

Authors:  A Foresi
Journal:  Allergy       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 13.146

2.  Absence of central effects with levocabastine eye drops.

Authors:  F Arriaga; N Rombaut
Journal:  Allergy       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 13.146

3.  Levocabastine nasal spray better than sodium cromoglycate and placebo in the topical treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis.

Authors:  M Schata; W Jorde; U Richarz-Barthauer
Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 10.793

4.  Iatrogenic Cushing's syndrome due to nasal betamethasone: a problem not to be sniffed at!

Authors:  C M Nutting; S R Page
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 2.401

5.  A multicenter clinical study of the efficacy and tolerability of azelastine nasal spray in the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis: a comparison with oral cetirizine.

Authors:  D Charpin; P Godard; R P Garay; M Baehre; D Herman; F B Michel
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 2.503

6.  Safety and tolerability of once-daily mometasone furoate aqueous nasal spray in children.

Authors:  M D Brannan; J M Herron; M B Affrime
Journal:  Clin Ther       Date:  1997 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.393

7.  Nasal congestion during pregnancy.

Authors:  E Ellegård; G Karlsson
Journal:  Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci       Date:  1999-08

8.  Prevalence of allergic diseases in schoolchildren in relation to family history, upper respiratory infections, and residential characteristics.

Authors:  N Aberg; J Sundell; B Eriksson; B Hesselmar; B Aberg
Journal:  Allergy       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 13.146

9.  Effectiveness of azelastine nasal solution in seasonal allergic rhinitis.

Authors:  W W Storms; D S Pearlman; P Chervinsky; J Grossman; P C Halverson; J J Freitag; M D Widlitz
Journal:  Ear Nose Throat J       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 1.697

Review 10.  Intranasal azelastine. A review of its efficacy in the management of allergic rhinitis.

Authors:  W McNeely; L R Wiseman
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 9.546

View more
  20 in total

Review 1.  The use of postoperative topical corticosteroids in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Marcela Fandiño; Kristian I Macdonald; John Lee; Ian J Witterick
Journal:  Am J Rhinol Allergy       Date:  2013 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.467

Review 2.  Optimal management of nasal congestion caused by allergic rhinitis in children: safety and efficacy of medical treatments.

Authors:  Glenis Scadding
Journal:  Paediatr Drugs       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 3.022

Review 3.  The role of local steroid injection for nasal polyposis.

Authors:  Marcelo B Antunes; Samuel S Becker
Journal:  Curr Allergy Asthma Rep       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 4.806

Review 4.  Allergic conjunctivitis and the impact of allergic rhinitis.

Authors:  Leonard Bielory
Journal:  Curr Allergy Asthma Rep       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 4.806

Review 5.  Rupatadine: a review of its use in the management of allergic disorders.

Authors:  Susan J Keam; Greg L Plosker
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 6.  Intranasal steroids in the treatment of allergy-induced rhinorrhea.

Authors:  Robert A Nathan
Journal:  Clin Rev Allergy Immunol       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 8.667

Review 7.  Patient adherence to allergic rhinitis treatment: results from patient surveys.

Authors:  Erkka Valovirta; Dermot Ryan
Journal:  Medscape J Med       Date:  2008-10-28

8.  Effectiveness of azelastine nasal spray in the treatment of adenoidal hyper-trophy in children.

Authors:  G Berkiten; T L Kumral; O Çakır; G Yıldırım; Z Salturk; Y Uyar; Y Atar
Journal:  Hippokratia       Date:  2014 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 0.471

Review 9.  Therapeutic targets in rhinosinusitis: infection or inflammation?

Authors:  Valerie J Lund
Journal:  Medscape J Med       Date:  2008-04-29

10.  Effectiveness of twice daily azelastine nasal spray in patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis.

Authors:  Friedrich Horak
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 2.423

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.