Literature DB >> 9017433

Occupational exposure to Cr(VI): comparison between chromium levels in lymphocytes, erythrocytes, and urine.

A Lukanova1, P Toniolo, A Zhitkovich, V Nikolova, T Panev, T Popov, E Taioli, M Costa.   

Abstract

The relationships between chromium (Cr) levels in lymphocytes, erythrocytes, urine, and ambient air were compared among 14 chrome-platers from a metallurgic plant in Bulgaria and two groups of local controls, one from the same heavily polluted industrial town as the chrome-platers (n = 11) and one from a seaside resort town 100 km away (n = 6). Among the chrome-platers, the Cr concentration in peripheral lymphocytes was positively correlated with total Cr and Cr(VI) levels in ambient air and with Cr excretion in urine. As compared to the controls, the chrome-platers had mean Cr levels in lymphocytes twice as high, in erythrocytes ninefold higher, and in urine fourfold to eightfold higher. Although Cr levels in urine and lymphocytes were similar between the two control groups, levels in erythrocytes were 3 times higher among subjects from the industrial area than among those from the seaside town. The study suggests that lymphocyte Cr could be a good indicator of the Cr body burden caused by high exposures to Cr(VI), such as in electroplating operations. In these conditions, erythrocyte Cr may be less useful, possibly owing to increased toxicity due to the high affinity of erythrocytes for Cr. However, when exposure is lower, such as in most environmental situations, erythrocyte Cr should provide a better and more sensitive index than lymphocyte Cr. By contrast, urinary Cr, which provides information on total Cr exposure, including Cr(III) from dietary and environmental sources, does not seem to be of value for studying occupational exposure to Cr(VI).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 9017433     DOI: 10.1007/bf02630737

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health        ISSN: 0340-0131            Impact factor:   3.015


  15 in total

1.  Chromium, nickel and welding.

Authors: 
Journal:  IARC Monogr Eval Carcinog Risks Hum       Date:  1990

2.  Biological markers in chromium exposure assessment: confounding variables.

Authors:  J A Bukowski; M D Goldstein; B B Johnson
Journal:  Arch Environ Health       Date:  1991 Jul-Aug

Review 3.  Is there a role for reactive oxygen species in the mechanism of chromium(VI) carcinogenesis?

Authors:  A M Standeven; K E Wetterhahn
Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol       Date:  1991 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.739

4.  Chromium-51 dosimetry of lymphocytes labeled incidentally during nuclear medicine procedures.

Authors:  M Vezza; D Giuliani; D V Rao; B S Morse
Journal:  Int J Rad Appl Instrum B       Date:  1987

5.  Distribution of chromium within cells of the blood.

Authors:  T P Coogan; K S Squibb; J Motz; P L Kinney; M Costa
Journal:  Toxicol Appl Pharmacol       Date:  1991-03-15       Impact factor: 4.219

6.  Designing a biological monitoring program to assess community exposure to chromium: conclusions of an expert panel.

Authors:  R A Anderson; T Colton; J Doull; J G Marks; R G Smith; G M Bruce; B L Finley; D J Paustenbach
Journal:  J Toxicol Environ Health       Date:  1993-12

7.  Chromium bond detection in isolated erythrocytes: a new principle of biological monitoring of exposure to hexavalent chromium.

Authors:  J Lewalter; U Korallus; C Harzdorf; H Weidemann
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 3.015

Review 8.  Mechanisms of chromium carcinogenicity and toxicity.

Authors:  M D Cohen; B Kargacin; C B Klein; M Costa
Journal:  Crit Rev Toxicol       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 5.635

9.  Uptake of chromate in human red blood cells and isolated rat liver cells: the role of the anion carrier.

Authors:  J Alexander; J Aaseth
Journal:  Analyst       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 4.616

10.  The potential usefulness of biological markers in risk assessment.

Authors:  F Perera
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 9.031

View more
  6 in total

1.  Mechanism of DNA-protein cross-linking by chromium.

Authors:  Andrea Macfie; Elizabeth Hagan; Anatoly Zhitkovich
Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol       Date:  2010-02-15       Impact factor: 3.739

2.  Oxidative damage induced by chromium (VI) in rat erythrocytes: protective effect of selenium.

Authors:  Nejla Soudani; Ibtissem Ben Amara; Afef Troudi; Ahmed Hakim; Hanen Bouaziz; Fatma Ayadi Makni; Khaled Mounir Zeghal; Najiba Zeghal
Journal:  J Physiol Biochem       Date:  2011-06-11       Impact factor: 4.158

3.  Exploration of Whole Blood Chromium as Biomarker of Hexavalent Chromium Exposure: Based on Literature Review and Monte Carlo Simulation.

Authors:  Shiyi Hong; Yali Zhang; Guiping Hu; Guang Jia
Journal:  Biol Trace Elem Res       Date:  2022-07-21       Impact factor: 4.081

4.  Alzheimer's Disease Association with Metals and Metalloids Concentration in Blood and Urine.

Authors:  Loreta Strumylaite; Rima Kregzdyte; Odeta Kucikiene; Dale Baranauskiene; Vaida Simakauskiene; Rima Naginiene; Gyte Damuleviciene; Vita Lesauskaite; Reda Zemaitiene
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-06-14       Impact factor: 4.614

5.  CrVI exposure and biomarkers: Cr in erythrocytes in relation to exposure and polymorphisms of genes encoding anion transport proteins.

Authors:  Qingshan Qu; Xiaomei Li; Feiyun An; Guang Jia; Lanzeng Liu; Hiroko Watanabe-Meserve; Karen Koenig; Beverly Cohen; Max Costa; Nirmal Roy; Mianhua Zhong; Lung Chi Chen; Suhua Liu; Lei Yan
Journal:  Biomarkers       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 2.658

6.  Biomonitoring of two types of chromium exposure in an electroplating shop.

Authors:  Francis Pierre; François Diebold; François Baruthio
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2007-06-29       Impact factor: 3.015

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.