Literature DB >> 8277519

Designing a biological monitoring program to assess community exposure to chromium: conclusions of an expert panel.

R A Anderson1, T Colton, J Doull, J G Marks, R G Smith, G M Bruce, B L Finley, D J Paustenbach.   

Abstract

The possible benefits of biological monitoring of large groups of people potentially exposed to environmental contaminants has become an area of much interest in recent years. Because chromite-ore processing residue has been found in some soils in northern New Jersey, urinary chromium monitoring of people in the community was evaluated as a potentially useful tool. In an attempt to identify those who could be exposed and to quantify the magnitude of exposure to the chromium in these soils, the New Jersey Department of Health (NJDOH) initiated a public health screening project. In 1992, the NJDOH proposed to evaluate over 4000 people who lived or worked near these sites. Volunteers were administered a questionnaire and were given a limited physical examination, and a single spot urine sample was collected. Because of the difficulties in using urinary chromium to assess low-level exposure and the potential implications of any regulatory decisions that could be based on the results of this project, a panel of experts was convened to evaluate the protocol. The panel consisted of five scientists and physicians with expertise in toxicology, dermatology, epidemiology, biological monitoring, and analytical chemistry. Like a World Health Organization group, the panel concluded that although urine biomonitoring can be useful in evaluating high levels of exposure to chromium, it is not reliable for assessing low-level exposure similar to that which may have occurred in northern New Jersey. The panel also noted that when urinary biomonitoring is to be used to assess the public's possible exposure, a large number of precautions must be taken to ensure the accuracy and usefulness of the results. The single most important recommendation was to collect a second, and perhaps a third, spot urine (or 24-h urine) sample before concluding that a person may be routinely overexposed. These suggestions are applicable to designing a biomonitoring program for nearly any environmental contaminant to which a community may be exposed. A review of scientific literature associated with biological monitoring of chromium is provided.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8277519     DOI: 10.1080/15287399309531819

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Toxicol Environ Health        ISSN: 0098-4108


  5 in total

1.  Occupational exposure to Cr(VI): comparison between chromium levels in lymphocytes, erythrocytes, and urine.

Authors:  A Lukanova; P Toniolo; A Zhitkovich; V Nikolova; T Panev; T Popov; E Taioli; M Costa
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 3.015

2.  Self reported health of people in an area contaminated by chromium waste: interview study.

Authors:  P McCarron; I Harvey; R Brogan; T J Peters
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-01-01

3.  Groundwater contaminated with hexavalent chromium [Cr (VI)]: a health survey and clinical examination of community inhabitants (Kanpur, India).

Authors:  Priti Sharma; Vipin Bihari; Sudhir K Agarwal; Vipin Verma; Chandrasekharan N Kesavachandran; Balram S Pangtey; Neeraj Mathur; Kunwar Pal Singh; Mithlesh Srivastava; Sudhir K Goel
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-10-24       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 4.  Applicability of non-invasively collected matrices for human biomonitoring.

Authors:  Roel Smolders; Karl-Werner Schramm; Marc Nickmilder; Greet Schoeters
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2009-03-09       Impact factor: 5.984

5.  Translating biomonitoring data into risk management and policy implementation options for a European Network on Human Biomonitoring.

Authors:  R Smolders; G Koppen; G Schoeters
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2008-06-05       Impact factor: 5.984

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.