Literature DB >> 9015322

Mildly impaired water maze performance in male Fmr1 knockout mice.

R D'Hooge1, G Nagels, F Franck, C E Bakker, E Reyniers, K Storm, R F Kooy, B A Oostra, P J Willems, P P De Deyn.   

Abstract

Fmr1 knockout mice constitute a putative model of fragile X syndrome, the most common form of heritable mental disability in humans. We have compared the performance of transgenic mice with an Fmr1 knockout with that of normal littermates in hidden- and visible-platform water maze learning, and showed that knockouts exhibit subnormal spatial learning abilities and marginal motor performance deficits. During 12 training trials of the hidden-platform task, escape latency and path length decreased significantly in knockouts and control littermates, and no effect of genotype was found. During four ensuing reversal trials, however, significant differences were found between knockouts and control littermates both in escape latency and path length. During the visible-platform condition, the reversal trials also revealed a difference between knockouts and normal littermates in escape latency, but not in path length. Possibly due to marginal motor incapacity, knockouts swam significantly slower than controls during these latter trials. During both probe trials of the hidden-platform task, knockouts as well as normal littermates spent more time in the target quadrant than in the other quadrants, and percent of time spent in the target quadrant was the same in both groups; swimming velocity was not significantly different between knockouts and normal littermates during these trials. Entries in the target area during the probe trials did show a significant effect of genotype on number of entries. The present results largely confirm and extend our previous findings. Impaired spatial abilities in Fmr1 knockouts might have been due to relatively low response flexibility or high memory interference in Fmr1 knockouts. It remains unclear, however, which brain region or neurochemical system might be involved in these disabilities. We conclude that Fmr1 knockout mice might be a valid model of fragile X mental retardation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9015322     DOI: 10.1016/s0306-4522(96)00224-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroscience        ISSN: 0306-4522            Impact factor:   3.590


  66 in total

1.  Ablation of Fmrp in adult neural stem cells disrupts hippocampus-dependent learning.

Authors:  Weixiang Guo; Andrea M Allan; Ruiting Zong; Li Zhang; Eric B Johnson; Eric G Schaller; Adeline C Murthy; Samantha L Goggin; Amelia J Eisch; Ben A Oostra; David L Nelson; Peng Jin; Xinyu Zhao
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2011-04-24       Impact factor: 53.440

2.  Discrimination learning and attentional set formation in a mouse model of Fragile X.

Authors:  Kimberly S Casten; Annette C Gray; Rebecca D Burwell
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 1.912

Review 3.  Ras and Rap signaling in synaptic plasticity and mental disorders.

Authors:  Ruth L Stornetta; J Julius Zhu
Journal:  Neuroscientist       Date:  2010-04-29       Impact factor: 7.519

4.  Extinction of an instrumental response: a cognitive behavioral assay in Fmr1 knockout mice.

Authors:  M S Sidorov; D D Krueger; M Taylor; E Gisin; E K Osterweil; M F Bear
Journal:  Genes Brain Behav       Date:  2014-04-30       Impact factor: 3.449

Review 5.  Fragile X syndrome and targeted treatment trials.

Authors:  Randi Hagerman; Julie Lauterborn; Jacky Au; Elizabeth Berry-Kravis
Journal:  Results Probl Cell Differ       Date:  2012

Review 6.  Stem cells and modeling of autism spectrum disorders.

Authors:  Beatriz C G Freitas; Cleber A Trujillo; Cassiano Carromeu; Marianna Yusupova; Roberto H Herai; Alysson R Muotri
Journal:  Exp Neurol       Date:  2012-10-02       Impact factor: 5.330

7.  Environmental enrichment reveals effects of genotype on hippocampal spine morphologies in the mouse model of Fragile X Syndrome.

Authors:  Julie C Lauterborn; Matiar Jafari; Alex H Babayan; Christine M Gall
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2013-09-17       Impact factor: 5.357

8.  Glycogen synthase kinase-3 inhibitors reverse deficits in long-term potentiation and cognition in fragile X mice.

Authors:  Aimee V Franklin; Margaret K King; Valle Palomo; Ana Martinez; Lori L McMahon; Richard S Jope
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2013-09-13       Impact factor: 13.382

9.  Inactivation of the maternal fragile X gene results in sensitization of GABAB receptor function in the offspring.

Authors:  Bojana Zupan; Miklos Toth
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  2008-09-23       Impact factor: 4.030

10.  Ras signaling mechanisms underlying impaired GluR1-dependent plasticity associated with fragile X syndrome.

Authors:  Hailan Hu; Yi Qin; Genrieta Bochorishvili; Yinghua Zhu; Linda van Aelst; J Julius Zhu
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-07-30       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.