Literature DB >> 9010011

Differential activation of the prefrontal cortex in successful and unsuccessful memory retrieval.

M D Rugg1, P C Fletcher, C D Frith, R S Frackowiak, R J Dolan.   

Abstract

Six subjects underwent PET scans while they performed three versions of a recognition memory test for words and three versions of a control task. In each memory condition, the subjects discriminated between words presented in a prescan study list and words new to the experiment. During the 30 s scanning interval, the ratio of old and new words was 0:20, 4:16 or 16:4, depending on the experimental condition. Outside this interval, the ratio was 50:50 in all three conditions. The requirement in the control task was to discriminate between two character strings, the ratios of which were also manipulated during the 30 s scanning interval. Employing the control task as a covariate, analysis with statistical parametric mapping revealed that regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF) covaried with increasing density of old items in three regions of prefrontal cortex: right dorsolateral [Brodmann area (BA) 9/46], right medial (BA 32/8) and bilateral frontopolar cortex (BA 10). It is concluded that the prefrontal cortex, especially in the right hemisphere, is more active when a retrieval attempt succeeds than when it fails. This finding is consistent with the idea that the prefrontal cortex supports processes that operate selectively on the products of memory retrieval.

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 9010011     DOI: 10.1093/brain/119.6.2073

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain        ISSN: 0006-8950            Impact factor:   13.501


  54 in total

1.  Can medial temporal lobe regions distinguish true from false? An event-related functional MRI study of veridical and illusory recognition memory.

Authors:  R Cabeza; S M Rao; A D Wagner; A R Mayer; D L Schacter
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-04-03       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Contrasting cortical activity associated with category memory and recognition memory.

Authors:  P J Reber; C E Stark; L R Squire
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  1998 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.460

3.  Functional asymmetry of human prefrontal cortex: encoding and retrieval of verbally and nonverbally coded information.

Authors:  B Opitz; A Mecklinger; A D Friederici
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2000 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.460

4.  Prefrontal cortex and episodic memory retrieval mode.

Authors:  M Lepage; O Ghaffar; L Nyberg; E Tulving
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-01-04       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Recollection and familiarity in recognition memory: an event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging study.

Authors:  R N Henson; M D Rugg; T Shallice; O Josephs; R J Dolan
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1999-05-15       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Comparative electrophysiological and hemodynamic measures of neural activation during memory-retrieval.

Authors:  E Düzel; T W Picton; R Cabeza; A P Yonelinas; H Scheich; H J Heinze; E Tulving
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 5.038

7.  PET evidence for multiple strategies of categorization.

Authors:  A L Patalano; E E Smith; J Jonides; R A Koeppe
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 3.282

8.  Neural processing associated with true and false memory retrieval.

Authors:  Yoko Okado; Craig Stark
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 3.282

9.  Behavioural and electrophysiological effects of visual paired associate context manipulations during encoding and recognition in younger adults, older adults and older cognitively declined adults.

Authors:  Michael J Hogan; Joanne P M Kenney; Richard A P Roche; Michael A Keane; Jennifer L Moore; Jochen Kaiser; Robert Lai; Neil Upton
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-12-06       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  The multiple neural networks of familiarity: A meta-analysis of functional imaging studies.

Authors:  Mathilde Horn; Renaud Jardri; Fabien D'Hondt; Guillaume Vaiva; Pierre Thomas; Delphine Pins
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 3.282

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.