Literature DB >> 9009923

Heritability of 39 orthodontic cephalometric parameters on MZ, DZ twins and MN-paired singletons.

C Manfredi1, R Martina, G B Grossi, M Giuliani.   

Abstract

The twin method is one of the most effective methods available for investigating genetically determined variables in orthodontics, as well as in other medical fields, depending on the variance in the shape and the size of skull and teeth, both on genetic and environmental influences. The former have been extensively evaluated and, in particular, most of the facial and dental cephalometric parameters have shown high heritability, the vertical parameters have a higher genetic control compared with the horizontal ones. Nevertheless, most of the results provided by twin research have been considered arbitrary if directly transferred to a singleton population and in further studies, including extensive analysis of the parents, familial and nutritional habits have been recommended. In this study, heritability of 39 lateral orthodontic cephalometric parameters has been estimated by both statistical method of path analysis and Dahlberg' quotient in three orthodontic samples of young monozygotic and dizygotic twins and same-sex pairs of singletons living together, matched for sex and age, to evaluate genetic versus environmental factors affecting heritability of craniofacial features in the aim to obtain results not only statistically significant but also transferrable to a singleton population. Different inheritance trends, showing the highest concordance of values between monozygotic twin pairs when compared with dizygotic twin pairs or the same-sex singletons paired group, come from the 39 selected lateral cephalometric parameters, confirming the hypothesis that strong genetic control is exerted especially on the vertical ones. Heritability seems to have more influence on anterior vertical parameters than posterior. Mandibular structure seems to be more genetically determined than mandibular size. All five Ricketts' cephalometric typological parameters confirm high heritability coefficients, the same applies to the linear horizontal McNamara's measurement and lower incisor to A-Pg line. The two tested statistical methods showed relevant concordance of results.

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9009923     DOI: 10.1016/s0889-5406(97)70301-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop        ISSN: 0889-5406            Impact factor:   2.650


  22 in total

1.  Differences in heritability of craniofacial skeletal and dental characteristics between hypo- and hyper-divergent patterns using Falconer's method and principal component analysis.

Authors:  Do-Keun Kim; Joohon Sung; Yun-Mi Song; Eung-Min Kim; Young Ho Kim; Seung-Hak Baek
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2018-12-05       Impact factor: 2.079

2.  Genetic and environmental components of vertical growth in mono- and dizygotic twins up to 15-18 years of age.

Authors:  Monika A Hersberger-Zurfluh; Spyridon N Papageorgiou; Melih Motro; Alpdogan Kantarci; Leslie A Will; Theodore Eliades
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2021-05-01       Impact factor: 2.079

3.  Heritability of Face Shape in Twins: A Preliminary Study using 3D Stereophotogrammetry and Geometric Morphometrics.

Authors:  Seth M Weinberg; Trish E Parsons; Mary L Marazita; Brion S Maher
Journal:  Dent 3000       Date:  2013

4.  Human Facial Shape and Size Heritability and Genetic Correlations.

Authors:  Joanne B Cole; Mange Manyama; Jacinda R Larson; Denise K Liberton; Tracey M Ferrara; Sheri L Riccardi; Mao Li; Washington Mio; Ophir D Klein; Stephanie A Santorico; Benedikt Hallgrímsson; Richard A Spritz
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2016-12-14       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Temporomandibular Joint Condyle-Disc Morphometric Sexual Dimorphisms Independent of Skull Scaling.

Authors:  Matthew C Coombs; Xin She; Truman R Brown; Elizabeth H Slate; Janice S Lee; Hai Yao
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2019-04-25       Impact factor: 1.895

6.  Heredity, Genetics and Orthodontics - How Much Has This Research Really Helped?

Authors:  James K Hartsfield; George Jeryn Jacob; Lorri Ann Morford
Journal:  Semin Orthod       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 0.970

7.  Candidate Gene Analyses of Skeletal Variation in Malocclusion.

Authors:  C S G da Fontoura; S F Miller; G L Wehby; B A Amendt; N E Holton; T E Southard; V Allareddy; L M Moreno Uribe
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2015-04-24       Impact factor: 6.116

8.  Expressional Analysis of MSX1 (Human) Revealed its Role in Sagittal Jaw Relationship.

Authors:  Prateek Gupta; Thakur Prasad Chaturvedi; Vipul Sharma
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2017-08-01

9.  Cephalometric craniofacial features in Saudi parents and their offspring.

Authors:  Tina D Alkhudhairi; Eman A Alkofide
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 2.079

10.  Fine tuning of craniofacial morphology by distant-acting enhancers.

Authors:  Catia Attanasio; Alex S Nord; Yiwen Zhu; Matthew J Blow; Zirong Li; Denise K Liberton; Harris Morrison; Ingrid Plajzer-Frick; Amy Holt; Roya Hosseini; Sengthavy Phouanenavong; Jennifer A Akiyama; Malak Shoukry; Veena Afzal; Edward M Rubin; David R FitzPatrick; Bing Ren; Benedikt Hallgrímsson; Len A Pennacchio; Axel Visel
Journal:  Science       Date:  2013-10-25       Impact factor: 47.728

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.