Literature DB >> 9009918

A role of pharyngeal length in obstructive sleep apnea patients.

E K Pae1, A A Lowe, J A Fleetham.   

Abstract

A narrow pharyngeal pathway may be one of the most significant predisposing factors for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Accordingly, the objectives of many treatment modalities are focused on widening the constricted part of the pharynx. Despite the obvious limitations as a two-dimensional imaging technique, cephalometrics has been used more recently as a clinical screening tool for OSA. This study was designed to investigate whether pharyngeal variables more reliable than a single measurement of the most constricted area exist in cephalograms. A total of 80 pairs of upright and supine cephalograms were obtained and subclassified into four groups, in accordance with OSA severity. A medial axis program conveniently provided the variables for the study by transforming digitized outlines of the pharyngeal structure. The results indicate that the pharyngeal length and the pharyngeal width below the most constricted area may be the most important variables. We observed that the pharynx becomes considerably longer in the apneic group after a body position change from upright to supine. Pharyngeal length in the supine position may be more important than a one-dimensional measurement of the most constricted area in the diagnosis and treatment of OSA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9009918     DOI: 10.1016/s0889-5406(97)70296-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop        ISSN: 0889-5406            Impact factor:   2.650


  8 in total

Review 1.  The importance of obstructive sleep apnoea and hypopnea pathophysiology for customized therapy.

Authors:  Marcello Bosi; Andrea De Vito; Riccardo Gobbi; Venerino Poletti; Claudio Vicini
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-07-28       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 2.  Mechanisms of sleep-disordered breathing: causes and consequences.

Authors:  Richard S T Leung; Vikram R Comondore; Clodagh M Ryan; Daniel Stevens
Journal:  Pflugers Arch       Date:  2011-11-15       Impact factor: 3.657

3.  Comparative effects of two oral appliances on upper airway structure in obstructive sleep apnea.

Authors:  Kate Sutherland; Sheryn A Deane; Andrew S L Chan; Richard J Schwab; Andrew T Ng; M Ali Darendeliler; Peter A Cistulli
Journal:  Sleep       Date:  2011-04-01       Impact factor: 5.849

Review 4.  Pathophysiology of sleep apnea.

Authors:  Jerome A Dempsey; Sigrid C Veasey; Barbara J Morgan; Christopher P O'Donnell
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 37.312

5.  The effect of posture and a mandibular protruding device on pharyngeal dimensions: a cephalometric study.

Authors:  Anette M C Fransson; Björn A H Svenson; Göran Isacsson
Journal:  Sleep Breath       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 2.816

6.  The Interaction Between Craniofacial Computed Tomographic Dimensional Parameters and BMI in Obstructive Sleep Apnea.

Authors:  Daniel Ben Ner; Narin Nard Carmel-Neiderman; Dan M Fliss; Noa Haas; Eyal Rosenzweig
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2018-08-27

7.  Validity of upper airway assessment in children: a clinical, cephalometric, and MRI study.

Authors:  Kirsi Pirilä-Parkkinen; Heikki Löppönen; Peter Nieminen; Uolevi Tolonen; Eija Pääkkö; Pertti Pirttiniemi
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2011-01-24       Impact factor: 2.079

8.  Effect of tube length on the buckling pressure of collapsible tubes.

Authors:  M Amin F Zarandi; Kevin Garman; John S Rhee; B Tucker Woodson; Guilherme J M Garcia
Journal:  Comput Biol Med       Date:  2021-07-28       Impact factor: 6.698

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.