Literature DB >> 12075480

The effect of posture and a mandibular protruding device on pharyngeal dimensions: a cephalometric study.

Anette M C Fransson1, Björn A H Svenson, Göran Isacsson.   

Abstract

The objectives were to evaluate the impact of body posture on cephalometric measures and the level and the extent to which treatment with a mandibular protruding device (MPD) affects pharyngeal width. The study was composed of 77 patients: 50 were diagnosed with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and 27 snored. After each patient underwent a baseline medical (including a somnographic registration), dental and stomatognathic examination, an MPD that would protrude the mandible 75% of the maximal protrusion range was fabricated. In a radiographic examination, four cephalograms were taken: two in the upright position with and without the MPD and two in the supine position with and without the MPD. The cephalometric measures focused on the pharyngeal structures. MPD treatment significantly increased the relative pharyngeal area (at the level of the oropharynx and the hypopharynx) by a mean of +89.6 mm2 (P < 0.01) in the upright posture. The relative pharyngeal area, however, was reduced by more than 50% in the supine position compared with the upright position, independent of MPD treatment. In the supine position, compared with upright, most pharyngeal measures decreased significantly; the hyoid was significantly lower and displaced posteriorly, and the area of the velum increased by a mean of +201.2 mm2 (P < 0.001). We conclude that the MPD significantly increased most pharyngeal measures except the linear distance between the hyoid bone and the third vertebra and decreased the area of the velum.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12075480     DOI: 10.1007/s11325-002-0055-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sleep Breath        ISSN: 1520-9512            Impact factor:   2.816


  25 in total

1.  Do oral appliances enlarge the airway in patients with obstructive sleep apnoea? A prospective computerized tomographic study.

Authors:  D J Gale; R H Sawyer; A Woodcock; P Stone; R Thompson; K O'Brien
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  A cephalometric comparison of subjects with snoring and obstructive sleep apnoea.

Authors:  J M Battagel; A Johal; B Kotecha
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  A method of studying adaptive changes of the oropharynx to variation in mandibular position in patients with obstructive sleep apnoea.

Authors:  P R L'Estrange; J M Battagel; B Harkness; M H Spratley; P J Nolan; G I Jorgensen
Journal:  J Oral Rehabil       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 3.837

4.  The effect of the tongue retaining device on awake genioglossus muscle activity in patients with obstructive sleep apnea.

Authors:  T Ono; A A Lowe; K A Ferguson; E K Pae; J A Fleetham
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 2.650

5.  A role of pharyngeal length in obstructive sleep apnea patients.

Authors:  E K Pae; A A Lowe; J A Fleetham
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 2.650

6.  Effect of position and lung volume on upper airway geometry.

Authors:  J M Fouke; K P Strohl
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  1987-07

7.  Can we predict the success of dental appliance therapy for the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea based on anatomic considerations?

Authors:  A A Lowe
Journal:  Sleep       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 5.849

8.  Airway dimensions and head posture in obstructive sleep apnoea.

Authors:  B Solow; S Skov; J Ovesen; P W Norup; G Wildschiødtz
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 3.075

9.  Cephalometric comparisons of craniofacial and upper airway structure by skeletal subtype and gender in patients with obstructive sleep apnea.

Authors:  A A Lowe; T Ono; K A Ferguson; E K Pae; C F Ryan; J A Fleetham
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 2.650

10.  The effect of a modified functional appliance on obstructive sleep apnea.

Authors:  P E Bonham; G F Currier; W C Orr; J Othman; R S Nanda
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 2.650

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Available techniques for objective assessment of upper airway narrowing in snoring and sleep apnea.

Authors:  Christian E Faber; Luisa Grymer
Journal:  Sleep Breath       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 2.816

2.  Long-term oral appliance therapy in obstructive sleep apnea syndrome: a controlled study on temporomandibular side effects.

Authors:  Michiel H J Doff; Steffanie K B Veldhuis; Aarnoud Hoekema; James J R Huddleston Slater; P J Wijkstra; Lambert G M de Bont; Boudewijn Stegenga
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2011-05-03       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  A randomized crossover study comparing two mandibular repositioning appliances for treatment of obstructive sleep apnea.

Authors:  Bradley Bishop; Ronald Verrett; Thomas Girvan
Journal:  Sleep Breath       Date:  2013-05-09       Impact factor: 2.816

4.  Multidisciplinary management of the airway in a trauma-induced brain injury patient.

Authors:  Jacques R Conaway; Steven C Scherr
Journal:  Sleep Breath       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 2.816

5.  Effects of a mandibular protruding device on the sleep of patients with obstructive sleep apnea and snoring problems: a 2-year follow-up.

Authors:  Anette M C Fransson; Ake Tegelberg; Lena Leissner; Bengt Wenneberg; Göran Isacsson
Journal:  Sleep Breath       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 2.816

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.