Literature DB >> 9007571

Prevalence of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions in adults revisited.

M J Penner1, T Zhang.   

Abstract

The potential influence of spectral analysis factors on estimates of the prevalence of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions (SOAE) was explored. The detection of a SOAE was influenced by two spectral factors: (1) the frequency resolution of the spectrum, and (2) the number of spectral averages. For 15 different combinations of these two factors, the estimate of the prevalence of SOAEs for females ranged from 64 to 81% and, for males, from 39 to 55%. Combining across all 15 combinations, 83% of the females and 62% of the males were judged to have SOAEs. These results provide a context for understanding the inconsistencies in previous estimates of the prevalence of SOAEs and underscore the need to employ many different spectral analyses because some SOAEs are only detected when the spectral analyses are suitably tailored.

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9007571     DOI: 10.1016/s0378-5955(96)00162-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  7 in total

1.  Ear effect and gender difference of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions in children with auditory processing disorder.

Authors:  Kimberly Z Wissler; Kyoko Nagao; L A Greenwood; Rebecca G Gaffney; R M Cardinale; Thierry Morlet
Journal:  Proc Meet Acoust       Date:  2014-07-18

2.  Synchronized Spontaneous Otoacoustic Emissions Provide a Signal-to-Noise Ratio Advantage in Medial-Olivocochlear Reflex Assays.

Authors:  James D Lewis
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2017-11-13

3.  Sex differences in hearing: Probing the role of estrogen signaling.

Authors:  Benjamin Z Shuster; Didier A Depireux; Jessica A Mong; Ronna Hertzano
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Reducing tectorial membrane viscoelasticity enhances spontaneous otoacoustic emissions and compromises the detection of low level sound.

Authors:  Thomas Bowling; Charlsie Lemons; Julien Meaud
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-05-16       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Comparative multivariate analyses of transient otoacoustic emissions and distorsion products in normal and impaired hearing.

Authors:  Mirela Cristina Stamate; Nicolae Todor; Marcel Cosgarea
Journal:  Clujul Med       Date:  2015-11-15

6.  Inverse Stochastic Resonance in Cerebellar Purkinje Cells.

Authors:  Anatoly Buchin; Sarah Rieubland; Michael Häusser; Boris S Gutkin; Arnd Roth
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2016-08-19       Impact factor: 4.475

7.  Otoacoustic emissions from ears with spontaneous activity behave differently to those without: Stronger responses to tone bursts as well as to clicks.

Authors:  W Wiktor Jedrzejczak; Krzysztof Kochanek; Henryk Skarzynski
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-02-16       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.