Literature DB >> 9006989

Prism adaptation of reaching movements: specificity for the velocity of reaching.

S Kitazawa1, T Kimura, T Uka.   

Abstract

Accurate reaching toward a visual target is disturbed after the visual field is displaced by prisms but recovers with practice. When the prisms are removed, subjects misreach in the direction opposite to the prism displacement (aftereffect). The present study demonstrated that the severity of the aftereffect depends on the velocity of the movements during and after the visual displacement. Trained subjects were required to reach with one of four movement durations (<300, approximately 800, approximately 2000, and approximately 5000 msec) from a fixed starting point to a target that appeared at a random location on a tangent screen (400 mm away). The size of the aftereffect was largest when the movement after the removal was performed with the same duration as that performed with the prisms. It became smaller as the difference in velocity became larger. When the contralateral arm was used after visual displacement, the aftereffect was never significant. Because the adaptation does not generalize across velocities or to the other arm, we infer that the underlying changes occur at a later stage in the transformation from visual input to motor output, in which not only the direction but also the time-dependent parameters of movements, such as velocity, acceleration or force, are represented.

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9006989      PMCID: PMC6793717     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  30 in total

1.  EFFECTS ON HAND-EYE COORDINATION OF TWO DIFFERENT ARM MOTIONS DURING COMPENSATION FOR DISPLACED VISION.

Authors:  S J FREEDMAN; S B HALL; J H REKOSH
Journal:  Percept Mot Skills       Date:  1965-06

2.  Adaptation to prisms: do proprioceptive changes mediate adapted behaviour with ballistic arm movements?

Authors:  J S Baily
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol       Date:  1972-02       Impact factor: 2.143

3.  Influence of concurrent and terminal exposure conditions on the nature of perceptual adaptation.

Authors:  J J Uhlarik; L K Canon
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1971-12

4.  Relation between red nucleus discharge and movement parameters in trained macaque monkeys.

Authors:  A R Gibson; J C Houk; N J Kohlerman
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1985-01       Impact factor: 5.182

5.  Output organization of intermediate cerebellum of the monkey.

Authors:  P L van Kan; J C Houk; A R Gibson
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Equilibrium-point control hypothesis examined by measured arm stiffness during multijoint movement.

Authors:  H Gomi
Journal:  Science       Date:  1996-04-05       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Functional classes of primate corticomotoneuronal cells and their relation to active force.

Authors:  P D Cheney; E E Fetz
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1980-10       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  An organizing principle for a class of voluntary movements.

Authors:  N Hogan
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1984-11       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Correlation of monkey pyramidal tract neuron activity to movement velocity in rapid wrist flexion movement.

Authors:  I Hamada
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1981-12-28       Impact factor: 3.252

10.  On the relations between the direction of two-dimensional arm movements and cell discharge in primate motor cortex.

Authors:  A P Georgopoulos; J F Kalaska; R Caminiti; J T Massey
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1982-11       Impact factor: 6.167

View more
  43 in total

1.  Learning motor synergies makes use of information on muscular load.

Authors:  J Fernández-Ruiz; C Hall-Haro; R Díaz; J Mischner; P Vergara; J C Lopez-Garcia
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2000 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.460

2.  Intermanual transfer of force control is modulated by asymmetry of muscular strength.

Authors:  Luis Augusto Teixeira; Leandro Quedas Caminha
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-01-31       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  How is a motor skill learned? Change and invariance at the levels of task success and trajectory control.

Authors:  Lior Shmuelof; John W Krakauer; Pietro Mazzoni
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-04-18       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Asymmetric transfer of visuomotor learning between discrete and rhythmic movements.

Authors:  Tsuyoshi Ikegami; Masaya Hirashima; Gentaro Taga; Daichi Nozaki
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-03-24       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Reorganization of finger coordination patterns during adaptation to rotation and scaling of a newly learned sensorimotor transformation.

Authors:  Xiaolin Liu; Kristine M Mosier; Ferdinando A Mussa-Ivaldi; Maura Casadio; Robert A Scheidt
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-10-27       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  To transfer or not to transfer? Kinematics and laterality quotient predict interlimb transfer of motor learning.

Authors:  Hannah Z Lefumat; Jean-Louis Vercher; R Chris Miall; Jonathan Cole; Frank Buloup; Lionel Bringoux; Christophe Bourdin; Fabrice R Sarlegna
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-09-02       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Gait speed influences aftereffect size following locomotor adaptation, but only in certain environments.

Authors:  Rami J Hamzey; Eileen M Kirk; Erin V L Vasudevan
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-01-20       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Short-term plasticity of the visuomotor map during grasping movements in humans.

Authors:  Daniel Säfström; Benoni B Edin
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2005 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.460

9.  Flexible strategies for sensory integration during motor planning.

Authors:  Samuel J Sober; Philip N Sabes
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2005-03-27       Impact factor: 24.884

10.  Frontal lesions predict response to prism adaptation treatment in spatial neglect: A randomised controlled study.

Authors:  Kelly M Goedert; Peii Chen; Anne L Foundas; A M Barrett
Journal:  Neuropsychol Rehabil       Date:  2018-03-20       Impact factor: 2.868

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.