Literature DB >> 9006468

Changing prognosis for babies of less than 28 weeks' gestation in the north of England between 1983 and 1994. Northern Neonatal Network.

W Tin1, U Wariyar, E Hey.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the changing prognosis for babies of less than 28 weeks' gestation.
DESIGN: A prospective, collaborative, population based survey.
SETTING: The former Northern Regional Health Authority.
SUBJECTS: All the births between 1983 and 1994 at 22 to 27 completed weeks' gestation to women normally resident in the region. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Miscarriage, stillbirth, death in the first year of life, and disability in survivors.
RESULTS: There were 479070 registered births in the study period. No baby of 22 weeks' gestation survived; only eight (4%) of the 197 babies of 23 weeks who were alive at the onset of labour survived for a year-a proportion that did not change during the study period. Survival among other babies of less than 28 weeks improved progressively between 1983-6 and 1991-4, but administration of artificial surfactant to babies requiring ventilation from mid-1990 was associated with further improvement in survival only in those over 25 weeks' gestation. Babies of 24 weeks required three times as much high dependency care per survivor as babies of 27 weeks (76 v 26 days). The rate of severe disability in the one year survivors of less than 26 weeks' gestation (30/123; 24%) was similar to that seen in the sampled survivors of 26 and 27 weeks (29/108; 27%); the proportion disabled did not change significantly during the study period. All the children born in 1983, 1987, and 1991 were later reassessed in greater detail: 10% (13/136) seemed destined for a continuing life of total dependency.
CONCLUSIONS: Gestation, if accurately assessed, can give a woman facing very preterm delivery a clear indication of the prognosis for her baby and help her judge the appropriateness of accepting obstetric intervention and sustained perinatal support.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9006468      PMCID: PMC2125606          DOI: 10.1136/bmj.314.7074.107

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ        ISSN: 0959-8138


  18 in total

1.  Neonatal care perspectives in India.

Authors:  M Singh
Journal:  Indian J Pediatr       Date:  1998 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.967

2.  Pulse oximetry, severe retinopathy, and outcome at one year in babies of less than 28 weeks gestation.

Authors:  W Tin; D W Milligan; P Pennefather; E Hey
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 5.747

3.  Outcomes for high risk New Zealand newborn infants in 1998-1999: a population based, national study.

Authors:  A E Cust; B A Darlow; D A Donoghue
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 5.747

4.  Improved outcomes for very low birthweight infants: evidence from New Zealand national population based data.

Authors:  B A Darlow; A E Cust; D A Donoghue
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 5.747

5.  Management of pregnancies with cervical shortening: a very short cervix is a very big problem.

Authors:  Hee Joong Lee; Tae Chul Park; Errol R Norwitz
Journal:  Rev Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2009

6.  Reinventing doctors. Will move doctors from this winter of discontent to a position of leadership.

Authors:  C Chantler
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998 Dec 19-26

7.  Gestational assessment assessed.

Authors:  U Wariyar; W Tin; E Hey
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 5.747

8.  Neonatal intensive care provision in the United Kingdom 1992-3. British Association of Perinatal Medicine.

Authors:  D W Milligan
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 5.747

Review 9.  Evidence of selection bias in preterm survival studies: a systematic review.

Authors:  D J Evans; M I Levene
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 5.747

10.  Survival of very preterm infants: Epipage, a population based cohort study.

Authors:  B Larroque; G Bréart; M Kaminski; M Dehan; M André; A Burguet; H Grandjean; B Ledésert; C Lévêque; F Maillard; J Matis; J C Rozé; P Truffert
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 5.747

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.