D J Evans1, M I Levene. 1. Centre for Reproduction, Growth and Development, University of Leeds, D Floor Clarendon Wing, The General Infirmary at Leeds, Leeds LS2 9NS, UK. evans_d@southmead.swest.nhs.uk
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine by how much selection bias in preterm infant cohort studies results in an overestimate of survival. DESIGN: Systematic review of studies reporting survival in infants less than 28 weeks of gestation published 1978-1998. Studies were graded according to cohort definition: A, stillbirths and live births; B, live births; C, neonatal unit admissions. Proportions of infants surviving to discharge were calculated for each week of gestation. RESULTS: Sixty seven studies report data on 55 cohorts (16 grade A, 23 grade B, 16 grade C). Studies that are more selective report significantly higher survival between 23 and 26 weeks of gestation (grade C > grade B > grade A, p < 0.01), exaggerating survival by 100% and 56% at 23 and 24 weeks respectively. CONCLUSION: To minimise the potential for overestimating survival around the limits of viability, future studies should endeavour to report the outcome of all pregnancies for each week of gestation (terminations, miscarriages, stillbirths, and all live births).
OBJECTIVE: To determine by how much selection bias in preterm infant cohort studies results in an overestimate of survival. DESIGN: Systematic review of studies reporting survival in infants less than 28 weeks of gestation published 1978-1998. Studies were graded according to cohort definition: A, stillbirths and live births; B, live births; C, neonatal unit admissions. Proportions of infants surviving to discharge were calculated for each week of gestation. RESULTS: Sixty seven studies report data on 55 cohorts (16 grade A, 23 grade B, 16 grade C). Studies that are more selective report significantly higher survival between 23 and 26 weeks of gestation (grade C > grade B > grade A, p < 0.01), exaggerating survival by 100% and 56% at 23 and 24 weeks respectively. CONCLUSION: To minimise the potential for overestimating survival around the limits of viability, future studies should endeavour to report the outcome of all pregnancies for each week of gestation (terminations, miscarriages, stillbirths, and all live births).
Authors: C G Nwaesei; D C Young; J M Byrne; M J Vincer; D Sampson; J R Evans; A C Allen; D A Stinson Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 1987-10 Impact factor: 8.661
Authors: W Kitchen; G W Ford; L W Doyle; A L Rickards; J V Lissenden; R J Pepperell; J E Duke Journal: Obstet Gynecol Date: 1985-08 Impact factor: 7.661
Authors: Kathrin Hanke; Annika Hartz; Maike Manz; Meike Bendiks; Friedhelm Heitmann; Thorsten Orlikowsky; Andreas Müller; Dirk Olbertz; Thomas Kühn; Jens Siegel; Axel von der Wense; Christian Wieg; Angela Kribs; Anja Stein; Julia Pagel; Egbert Herting; Wolfgang Göpel; Christoph Härtel Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-04-09 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Forouzan Akrami; Gohar Mohammadi; Mehdi Azizmohammad Looha; Abbas Habibelahi; Yadollah Mehrabi; Shahnaz Delbarpoor Ahmadi; Mohammad Heidarzadeh Journal: Med J Islam Repub Iran Date: 2021-03-29