Literature DB >> 9006231

Patients' perceptions on informed consent and the quality of information disclosure in clinical trials.

F W Verheggen1, R Jonkers, G Kok.   

Abstract

In a survey on 26 clinical trials we studied how patients experience and evaluate the information disclosure on the clinical trial they are enrolled in and which factors influence patients' perceptions of information disclosure. Our objective was to obtain more insight thereby in how informed consent is applied in the daily practice of clinical trials. Interviews were held with 198 adult patients and 32 trial-clinicians. Instead of focusing on patient comprehension of the information disclosed we analyzed patient perceptions of informed consent. Patients proved to be quite satisfied with the oral and written information disclosure. Patients' perceptions of the manner and content of information disclosure are influenced by more general attitudes towards medical care, research and institutions. Patients' trust in medical experiments, belief in the integrity of physicians and interest in medical affairs have an impact on the way patients perceive information disclosure. To improve the quality of the informed consent procedure, we propose a patient motivation classification (PMC) to enable trial-clinicians to gain more insight into patient motivation. Relevant factors found in our data have been used as criteria for classification. An informed decision making checklist (IDC) is suggested for patients as a general outline for patient education, covering relevant socio-psychological factors of enrollment.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomedical and Behavioral Research; Empirical Approach

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 9006231     DOI: 10.1016/0738-3991(96)00859-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Patient Educ Couns        ISSN: 0738-3991


  12 in total

1.  Satisfaction with the decision to participate in cancer clinical trials is high, but understanding is a problem.

Authors:  M Jefford; L Mileshkin; J Matthews; H Raunow; C O'Kane; T Cavicchiolo; H Brasier; M Anderson; J Reynolds
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2010-02-23       Impact factor: 3.603

2.  Participant Perspectives in an HIV Cure-Related Trial Conducted Exclusively in Women in the United States: Results from AIDS Clinical Trials Group 5366.

Authors:  Karine Dubé; Lara Hosey; Kate Starr; Liz Barr; David Evans; Erin Hoffman; Danielle M Campbell; Jane Simoni; Jeremy Sugarman; John Sauceda; Brandon Brown; Karen L Diepstra; Catherine Godfrey; Daniel R Kuritzkes; David A Wohl; Rajesh Gandhi; Eileen Scully
Journal:  AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 2.205

3.  A pilot study of simple interventions to improve informed consent in clinical research: feasibility, approach, and results.

Authors:  Nancy E Kass; Holly A Taylor; Joseph Ali; Kristina Hallez; Lelia Chaisson
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2014-12-04       Impact factor: 2.486

4.  Improving informed consent: pilot of a decision aid for women invited to participate in a breast cancer prevention trial (IBIS-II DCIS).

Authors:  I Juraskova; P Butow; A Lopez; M Seccombe; A Coates; F Boyle; N McCarthy; L Reaby; J F Forbes
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 3.377

5.  Healthy women's motivators and barriers to participation in a breast cancer cohort study: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Pamela S Sinicrope; Christi A Patten; Sarah M Bonnema; Julka R Almquist; Christina M Smith; Timothy J Beebe; Steven J Jacobsen; Celine M Vachon
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  2009-03-09       Impact factor: 3.797

6.  Randomisation in trials: do potential trial participants understand it and find it acceptable?

Authors:  C Kerr; E Robinson; A Stevens; D Braunholtz; S Edwards; R Lilford
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 2.903

Review 7.  Participants' understanding of informed consent in clinical trials over three decades: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Nguyen Thanh Tam; Nguyen Tien Huy; Le Thi Bich Thoa; Nguyen Phuoc Long; Nguyen Thi Huyen Trang; Kenji Hirayama; Juntra Karbwang
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  2015-01-22       Impact factor: 9.408

8.  Placebo-controlled clinical trials: how trial documents justify the use of randomisation and placebo.

Authors:  Tapani Keränen; Arja Halkoaho; Emmi Itkonen; Anna-Maija Pietilä
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2015-01-11       Impact factor: 2.652

9.  Informed consent in robotic surgery: quality of information and patient perception.

Authors:  Alessia Ferrarese; Giada Pozzi; Felice Borghi; Luca Pellegrino; Pierpaolo Di Lorenzo; Bruno Amato; Michele Santangelo; Massimo Niola; Valter Martino; Emanuele Capasso
Journal:  Open Med (Wars)       Date:  2016-08-02

10.  How do parents experience being asked to enter a child in a randomised controlled trial?

Authors:  Valerie Shilling; Bridget Young
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2009-02-16       Impact factor: 2.652

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.