Literature DB >> 19269854

Healthy women's motivators and barriers to participation in a breast cancer cohort study: a qualitative study.

Pamela S Sinicrope1, Christi A Patten, Sarah M Bonnema, Julka R Almquist, Christina M Smith, Timothy J Beebe, Steven J Jacobsen, Celine M Vachon.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This focus group study describes motivators and barriers to participation in the Mayo Mammography Health Study (MMHS), a large-scale longitudinal study examining the causal association of breast density with breast cancer, involving completion of a survey, providing access to a residual blood sample for genetic analyses, and sharing their results from a screening mammogram. These women would then be followed up long term for breast cancer incidence and mortality.
METHODS: Forty-eight women participated in six focus groups, four with MMHS non-respondents (n = 27), and two with MMHS respondents (n = 21). Major themes were summarized using content analysis. Social cognitive theory (SCT) was used as a framework for interpretation of the findings.
RESULTS: Barriers to participation among MMHS non-respondents were 1) lack of confidence in their ability to fill out the survey accurately (self-efficacy); 2) lack of perceived personal connection to the study or value of participation (expectancies); and 3) fear related to some questions about perceived cancer risk and worry/concern (emotional coping responses). Among MMHS respondents, personal experience with cancer was reported as a primary motivator for participation (expectancies).
CONCLUSIONS: Application of a theoretical model such as social cognitive therapy to the development of a study recruitment plan could be used to improve rates of study participation and provide a reproducible and evaluable strategy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19269854      PMCID: PMC3682676          DOI: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2009.01.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Epidemiol        ISSN: 1047-2797            Impact factor:   3.797


  21 in total

1.  Leverage-saliency theory of survey participation: description and an illustration.

Authors:  R M Groves; E Singer; A Corning
Journal:  Public Opin Q       Date:  2000

Review 2.  Increasing response rates to postal questionnaires: systematic review.

Authors:  Phil Edwards; Ian Roberts; Mike Clarke; Carolyn DiGuiseppi; Sarah Pratap; Reinhard Wentz; Irene Kwan
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-05-18

3.  Applications of the monitoring process model to coping with severe long-term medical threats.

Authors:  S M Miller; M Rodoletz; C E Mangan; C M Schroeder; T V Sedlacek
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 4.267

Review 4.  Participation rates in epidemiologic studies.

Authors:  Sandro Galea; Melissa Tracy
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  2007-06-06       Impact factor: 3.797

5.  Promoting research participation: why not advertise altruism?

Authors:  Brian Williams; Vikki Entwistle; Gill Haddow; Mary Wells
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2008-01-28       Impact factor: 4.634

6.  Controlled trial of the effect of length, incentives, and follow-up techniques on response to a mailed questionnaire.

Authors:  S C Hoffman; A E Burke; K J Helzlsouer; G W Comstock
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1998-11-15       Impact factor: 4.897

7.  Response rate to mailed epidemiologic questionnaires: a population-based randomized trial of variations in design and mailing routines.

Authors:  S Eaker; R Bergström; A Bergström; H O Adami; O Nyren
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1998-01-01       Impact factor: 4.897

8.  Promoting informed choice: transforming health care to dispense knowledge for decision making.

Authors:  Steven H Woolf; Evelyn C Y Chan; Russell Harris; Stacey L Sheridan; Clarence H Braddock; Robert M Kaplan; Alex Krist; Annette M O'Connor; Sean Tunis
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2005-08-16       Impact factor: 25.391

9.  Evaluation of informed consent: a pilot study.

Authors:  Helena Länsimies-Antikainen; Anna-Maija Pietilä; Tomi Laitinen; Ursula Schwab; Rainer Rauramaa; Esko Länsimies
Journal:  J Adv Nurs       Date:  2007-06-03       Impact factor: 3.187

10.  When "no" might not quite mean "no"; the importance of informed and meaningful non-consent: results from a survey of individuals refusing participation in a health-related research project.

Authors:  Brian Williams; Linda Irvine; Alison R McGinnis; Marion E T McMurdo; Iain K Crombie
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2007-04-26       Impact factor: 2.655

View more
  11 in total

1.  50 % Response rates: half-empty, or half-full?

Authors:  James V Lacey; Kristen E Savage
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2016-04-21       Impact factor: 2.506

2.  Description of environmental determinants of quality of life in children with intellectual disability in Japan using the Delphi technique.

Authors:  Luyinga Kalay; Saeko Fujimori; Hanako Suzuki; Keiko Minamoto; Kimiyo Ueda; Chang-Nian Wei; Akemi Tomoda; Koichi Harada; Atsushi Ueda
Journal:  Environ Health Prev Med       Date:  2009-10-07       Impact factor: 3.674

3.  Characteristics Associated with Participation in ENGAGED 2 - A Web-based Breast Cancer Risk Communication and Decision Support Trial.

Authors:  Karen J Wernli; Erin A Bowles; Sarah Knerr; Kathleen A Leppig; Kelly Ehrlich; Hongyuan Gao; Marc D Schwartz; Suzanne C O'Neill
Journal:  Perm J       Date:  2020-12

4.  The impact of distance and duration of travel on participation rates and participants' satisfaction: results from a pilot study at one study centre in Pretest 2 of the German National Cohort.

Authors:  Aparna Schweitzer; Manas K Akmatov; Florentina Kindler; Yvonne Kemmling; Lothar Kreienbrock; Gérard Krause; Frank Pessler
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2015-08-21       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  Are personal characteristics of massage therapists associated with their clinical, educational, and interpersonal behaviors?

Authors:  Karen Boulanger; Shelly Campo
Journal:  Int J Ther Massage Bodywork       Date:  2013-09-03

6.  Registry-based analysis of participator representativeness: a source of concern for sickness absence research?

Authors:  Marit Knapstad; Jesper Löve; Kristina Holmgren; Gunnel Hensing; Simon Øverland
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-10-21       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  Motivations for participating in a non-interventional gender-based violence survey in a low-income setting in South Africa.

Authors:  Yandisa Sikweyiya; Mzikazi Nduna; Nwabisa Shai; Rachel Jewkes
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2017-06-29       Impact factor: 3.295

8.  Quality assurance target for community-based breast cancer screening in China: a model simulation.

Authors:  Lan Yang; Jing Wang; Juan Cheng; Yuan Wang; Wenli Lu
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2018-03-07       Impact factor: 4.430

9.  Using Garden Cafés to engage community stakeholders in health research.

Authors:  Joyce E Balls-Berry; Pamela S Sinicrope; Miguel A Valdez Soto; Monica L Albertie; Rene Lafflam; Brittny T Major-Elechi; Young J Juhn; Tabetha A Brockman; Martha J Bock; Christi A Patten
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-08-10       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Newspaper coverage of biobanks.

Authors:  Ubaka Ogbogu; Maeghan Toews; Adam Ollenberger; Pascal Borry; Helene Nobile; Manuela Bergmann; Timothy Caulfield
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2014-07-31       Impact factor: 2.984

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.