BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The micronucleus test, generally done in cultured tumour cells irradiated in vitro, has not gained wide acceptance in predicting human cancer radiosensitivity. The purpose of this study was to see if micronucleus assay by serial scrape smear cytology can predict oral cancer radiosensitivity. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty nine oral cancer patients given radiotherapy (60 Gy/25 fractions/5 weeks) form the study population. Serial scrape smears were taken from their tumours before treatment and after delivery of 2, 5, 8 and 12 fractions, stained by Giemsa and the number of micronucleated cells (MNC) noted. The patients were grouped to those who developed tumour recurrence ('Resistant') and those who did not ('Sensitive'), and the pattern of micronucleus induction compared. RESULTS: Both groups of tumours had MNC even before treatment, with statistically significant dose-related increase with radiotherapy. The sensitive group had a higher mean increase in MNC count than the resistant group (6.1 times and 3.6 times the pre-treatment value, respectively) and better correlation with dose (r = 0.54 vs. 0.43). The increase in MNC count occurred earlier in the resistant group than in the sensitive, the TMNC (time for the pre-treatment value to double) being 3.3 days and 7.6 days, respectively. Also, the resistant group showed a plateauing of the MNC count which the sensitive group lacked. CONCLUSIONS: The higher MNC induction in the sensitive tumours suggests the usefulness of the assay as a test of radiosensitivity. The differing patterns of MNC increase suggest that differences in proliferation rate is an important cause of tumour failure. Serial cytological assay of micronucleus induction can identify both radiosensitivity and proliferation characteristics of tumours, and thus may turn out to be a useful test of radiocurability.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The micronucleus test, generally done in cultured tumour cells irradiated in vitro, has not gained wide acceptance in predicting humancancer radiosensitivity. The purpose of this study was to see if micronucleus assay by serial scrape smear cytology can predict oral cancer radiosensitivity. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty nine oral cancerpatients given radiotherapy (60 Gy/25 fractions/5 weeks) form the study population. Serial scrape smears were taken from their tumours before treatment and after delivery of 2, 5, 8 and 12 fractions, stained by Giemsa and the number of micronucleated cells (MNC) noted. The patients were grouped to those who developed tumour recurrence ('Resistant') and those who did not ('Sensitive'), and the pattern of micronucleus induction compared. RESULTS: Both groups of tumours had MNC even before treatment, with statistically significant dose-related increase with radiotherapy. The sensitive group had a higher mean increase in MNC count than the resistant group (6.1 times and 3.6 times the pre-treatment value, respectively) and better correlation with dose (r = 0.54 vs. 0.43). The increase in MNC count occurred earlier in the resistant group than in the sensitive, the TMNC (time for the pre-treatment value to double) being 3.3 days and 7.6 days, respectively. Also, the resistant group showed a plateauing of the MNC count which the sensitive group lacked. CONCLUSIONS: The higher MNC induction in the sensitive tumours suggests the usefulness of the assay as a test of radiosensitivity. The differing patterns of MNC increase suggest that differences in proliferation rate is an important cause of tumour failure. Serial cytological assay of micronucleus induction can identify both radiosensitivity and proliferation characteristics of tumours, and thus may turn out to be a useful test of radiocurability.